| 9:00 A.M. |
UW SCHOOL OF LAW |
May 19, 2009 |
THREE CASES ONLY - TWO IN A.M. - ONE IN P.M.
Case No. 1 - 81992-1
|
COUNSEL |
CITY OF SEATTLE
v.
ROBERT ST. JOHN
|
Rebecca Robertson
Ryan Robertson
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether a law enforcement officer may obtain a warrant to perform a non-consensual blood alcohol test after a driver has withdrawn his consent to such a test under Washington’s Implied Consent Law.
|
Case No. 2 - 81195-4
|
COUNSEL |
JOSIE ARMANTROUT, Personal
Representative of the Estate of KRISTEN ARMANTROUT
v.
ROBERT CARLSON, M.D
and
CASCADE ORTHOPAEDICS
|
Simeon Osborn/Susan Machler
Steven Fitzer/Melanie Stella & Timothy Gosselin |
SYNOPSIS: Whether the provision of services that have an economic value can be considered by the trier of fact when determining if a claimant was sufficiently dependent on another for support in order to maintain an action for wrongful death under RCW 4.20.020.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 200,625-6
|
COUNSEL |
In re:
LARRY BOTIMER,
Attorney at Law.
|
Paul Simmerly
Randy Von Beitel (WSBA)
|
SYNOPSIS: An attorney argues that the court should reject the Washington State Bar Association Disciplinary Board’s recommendation that he be suspended from the practice of law.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
