Skip Page LinksWelcome to Washington State Courts
Courts Home> Courts > Supreme Court Issues
 

Supreme Court Issues
* Cases Not Yet Set


Attorney and Client—Business Transaction With Client—Rules of Professional Conduct—Agreements That Violate Rules—Validity

Whether an attorney violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.8 in relation to a business contract with his clients, and if so, whether the rule violation constituted grounds for rescinding the contract as void.

No. 88132-4, LK Operating, et al. (petitioners) v. The Collections Group, LLC, et al. (respondents).

168 Wn. App. 862 (2012)

Top

Criminal Law—Evidence—Privacy Act—Private Conversations—What Constitutes

Whether a conversation between a defendant and his brother-in-law in the brother-in-law’s kitchen was private, making a recording of the conversation without the defendant’s permission inadmissible under the privacy act, chapter 9.73 RCW, in the defendant’s prosecution.

No. 88083-2, State (respondent) v. Kipp (petitioner).

171 Wn. App. 14 (2012)

Top

Criminal Law—Insanity—Competency to Stand Trial—Restoration of Competency—Burden of Proof

Whether a criminal defendant or the State bears the burden of proof regarding restoration of the defendant’s competency to stand trial after the defendant has been found to be incompetent.

No. 88111-1, State (petitioner) v. Coley (respondent).

177 Wn. App. 177 (2012)

Top

Criminal Law—Kidnapping—First Degree Kidnapping—Elements—Holding Victim as Shield or Hostage—What Consitutes

Whether the defendant in a prosecution for first degree kidnapping committed the crime by means of holding a person “as a shield or hostage” when he confined the victim in her home and thereby prevented her from calling the police.

No. 88020-4, State (respondent) v. Garcia (petitioner).

Top

Criminal Law—Punishment—Sentence—Criminal History—Foreign Offenses—Classification—Comparability—Defenses—Effect

Whether voluntary manslaughter in Texas is legally comparable to a Washington homicide offense even though self-defense is not an available defense in Texas, allowing a prior Texas conviction to be counted in a Washington offender score for sentencing purposes.

No. 85410-6, State (respondent) v. Jordan (petitioner).

158 Wn. App. 297 (2010) Published in Part

Top

Criminal Law—Punishment—Sentence—Good Behavior Credits—Presentence Jail Time—Equal Protection—Inmates of Different County Jails

Whether equal protection principles are violated by differences between counties in standards and rules for awarding good behavior credits for presentence jail time.

No. 87717-3, Pers. Restraint Petition of Williams, Gregory Williams (petitioner); State (respondent).

Top

*Criminal Law—Trial—Right to Public Trial—Scope—Jury Instruction Conference

Whether in a criminal prosecution conferences between the trial court and counsel on proposed jury instructions are subject to the constitutional right to a public trial.

No. 85306-1, State (respondent) v. Koss (petitioner).

Top

*Criminal Law—Trial—Right to Public Trial—Scope—Jury Selection—Dismissal of Prospective Jurors for Hardship

Whether in this criminal prosecution the trial court violated the defendant’s constitutional right to a public trial when it closed the courtroom to spectators while considering and ruling on the dismissal of some prospective jurors for hardship.

No. 86072-6, State (petitioner) v. Njonge (respondent).

Top

*Criminal Law—Trial—Right to Public Trial—Scope—Jury Selection—In-Chambers Conference on Dismissal of Prospective Jurors

Whether the trial court in this criminal prosecution violated the defendant’s constitutional right to a public trial by conferring with counsel (but not the defendant) in chambers about whether some prospective jurors should be dismissed.

No. 87844-7, State (petitioner) v. Slert (respondent).

Top

*Criminal Law—Trial—Right to Public Trial—Scope—Sidebar Conference on Evidentiary Matters

Whether the trial court in a criminal prosecution violated the defendant’s constitutional right to a public trial when it held sidebar conferences with counsel on evidentiary matters outside the courtroom without first conducting the analysis required by State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 906 P.2d 325 (1995).

No. 85809-8, State (petitioner) v. Smith (petitioner).

Top

*Criminal Law—Trial—Right to Public Trial—Violation—“De Minimis” Courtroom Closure—Individual Questioning of One Prospective Juror in Chambers

Whether in these criminal prosecutions the examination of one prospective juror in chambers during jury selection constituted a “de minimis” courtroom closure that did not violate the constitutional right a public trial.

No. 86216-8 (consol. w/87259-7), State (petitioner) v. Shearer (respondent); State (petitioner) v. Grisby (respondent).

Top

*Criminal Law—Trial—Right to Public Trial—Waiver—Validity

Whether a defendant in criminal prosecution may waive his or her constitutional right to a public trial, and if so, whether the defendants in these cases knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived their right to a public trial during jury selection.

No. 80727-2 (consol. w/86513-2), State (petitioner) v. Frawley (respondent); State (respondent) v. Applegate (petitioner).

140 Wn. App. 713 (2007)
Frawley

163 Wn. App. 460 (2011) Published in Part
Applegate

Top

Criminal Law—Unlawful Confinement of Animals—Probation Conditions—Forfeiture of All Pets and Livestock—Prohibition Against Owning, Acquiring, or Living with Pets and Livestock—Validity—Restitution—Cost of Caring for Confiscated Animals—Sufficiency of Evidence

Whether in a district court prosecution for unlawful confinement of domestic animals (dogs), the court properly ordered as conditions of probation that the defendant forfeit all of her pets and livestock and not own, acquire, or live with pets or livestock, and whether the evidence supports the amount of restitution the court imposed for the cost of caring for the defendant’s confiscated dogs.

No. 88140-5, State (respondent) v. Deskins (petitioner).

Top

Environment—SEPA—Impact Statement—Threshold Determination—Administrative Review—Open Record Hearing—Consolidation With Underlying Government Action—Necessity

Whether Kittitas County erroneously held a closed record appeal of a determination of nonsignificance under the State Environmental Policy Act rather than consolidate the appeal with the open record consideration of the underlying conditional use permit application.

No. 88165-1, Ellensburg Cement Prods., Inc. (respondent) v. Kittitas County, et al. (petitioners).

171 Wn. App. 691 (2012)

Top

Government—Torts—Action Against Public Officer—Venue—County Where Cause Arose—Necessity—Personal Misconduct

Whether alleged acts of workplace sexual harassment by a deputy prosecutor were “in virtue of” his office, requiring a sexual harassment lawsuit to be tried in the county where the alleged harassment occurred. See RCW 4.12.020(2).

No. 88021-2, Eubanks & Gray (respondents) v. Brown (petitioner).

170 Wn. App. 768 (2012)

Top

*Insurance—Bad Faith—Denial of Coverage—Treble Damages—Actual Damages—What Constitutes—Pretrial Arbitration Award

Whether an amount awarded in arbitration to a plaintiff before he instituted a lawsuit under the Insurance Fair Conduct Act constitutes “actual damages” under the act for purposes of trebling damages pursuant to RCW 48.30.015(2).

No. 88706-3, Morella (plaintiff) v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Illinois (defendant).

Certified Question from U.S. District Court, for the Western District of Washington at Seattle

Top

Judgment—Foreign Country Judgment—Registration—Comity—Japanese Divorce Decree Money Judgment—Effect of Post-Divorce Japanese Guardianship of Former Spouses’ Child

Whether a money judgment in a divorce decree entered by a Japanese family court is entitled to registration in Washington under comity principles where the former wife is deceased and the former spouses’ child is the ward of a post-divorce guardianship awarded to the child’s Japanese maternal grandmother by a Japanese court.

No. 88045-0, In re Estate of Toland, Etusko Futagi Toland, Deceased; Hille (petitioner) v. Toland (respondent).

Top

Landlord and Tenant—Unlawful Detainer—Jurisdictional Requirements—Notice—Statutory Provisions—Degree of Compliance

Whether the trial court in an unlawful detainer action lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the landlord’s statutory notice to the tenants failed to inform the tenants they could respond by mail or facsimile. See RCW 59.18.365.

No. 81813-4, Torkild (respondent) v. Johnston (petitioner). STAYED PENDING BANRUPTCY

Top

Open Government—Courts—Public Access—Constitutional Right—State Constitution—Applicability to Drug Diversion Court Meetings

Whether closed and unrecorded drug diversion court meetings held to evaluate participants’ drug treatment progress violate the right to open judicial proceedings under article I, section 10 of the state constitution.

No. 87946-0 (consol. w/87947-8), State (petitioner) v. Sykes (respondent).

Top

Property—Right of Action—Location of Actions—Statutory Provision—Effect—Jurisdiction or Venue

Whether a statute that requires actions “for any injuries to real property” to be commenced in the county in which the subject of the action is situated is jurisdictional or relates only to venue.

No. 88115-4, Ralph, et al. (petitioners) v. State, et al. (respondents).

Top

 
 
Courts | Organizations | News | Opinions | Rules | Forms | Directory | Library 
Back to Top | Privacy and Disclaimer Notices