ELC 8.3
DISABILITY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE COURSE OF DISCIPLINARY
PROCEEDINGS
(a) Supplemental Proceedings on Capacity To Defend. A
hearing officer or hearing panel, or chief hearing officer
if no hearing officer has been appointed, must order a
supplemental proceeding on the respondent lawyer’s capacity
to defend the disciplinary proceedings if the respondent
asserts, or there is reasonable cause to believe, that the
respondent is incapable of properly defending the
disciplinary proceeding because of mental or physical
incapacity.
(b) Purpose of Supplemental Proceedings. In a supplemental
proceeding, the hearing officer or panel determines if the
respondent:
(1) is incapable of defending himself or herself in
the disciplinary proceedings because of mental or
physical incapacity;
(2) is incapable, because of mental or physical
incapacity, of defending against the disciplinary
charges without the assistance of counsel; or
(3) is currently unable to practice law because of
mental or physical incapacity.
(c) Not Disciplinary Proceedings. Proceedings under this
rule are not disciplinary proceedings.
(d) Procedure for Supplemental Proceedings.
(1) Applicable Rules. Proceedings under this rule are
conducted under the procedural rules for disciplinary
proceedings.
(2) Deferral of Disciplinary Proceedings. The
disciplinary proceedings are deferred pending the
outcome of the supplemental proceeding.
(3) Appointment of Counsel. If counsel for the
respondent does not appear within 20 days of notice to
the respondent of the issues to be considered in a
supplemental proceeding under this rule, or within the
time for filing an answer, the Chair must appoint a
member of the Association as counsel for the respondent
in the supplemental proceedings.
(4) Health Records. Disciplinary counsel may require
the respondent to furnish written releases and
authorizations for medical, psychological, or
psychiatric records as may be relevant to the
determination under section (b), subject to a motion to
the hearing officer to limit the scope of the requested
releases or authorizations for good cause. If the
respondent asserted incapacity, there is a rebuttable
presumption that good cause does not exist.
(5) Examination. Upon motion, the hearing officer may
order an examination by a physician of the respondent’s
physical condition or by a mental health professional
(as defined by RCW 71.05.020) of the respondent’s
mental condition to assist in the determinations to be
made under section (b). Unless waived by the parties,
the examiner must submit a report of the examination,
including the results of any tests administered and any
diagnosis, to the hearing officer, disciplinary
counsel, and the respondent.
(6) Failure To Appear or Cooperate. If the respondent
fails to appear for an independent examination, fails
to waive health care provider-patient privilege as
required in these rules, or fails to appear at the
hearing, the following procedures apply:
(A) If the Association has the burden of proof, the
hearing officer must hold a hearing and, if
presented with sufficient evidence to determine
incapacity, order the respondent transferred to
disability inactive status. If there is
insufficient evidence to determine incapacity, the
hearing officer must enter an order terminating the
supplemental proceedings and reinstating the
disciplinary proceedings. A respondent who does
not appear at the hearing may move to vacate the
order of transfer under rule 10.6(c).
(B) If the respondent has the burden of proof, the
hearing officer must enter an order terminating the
supplemental proceedings and resuming the
disciplinary proceedings.
(7) Hearing Officer Decision.
(A) Capacity To Defend and Practice Law. If the
hearing officer or panel finds that the respondent
is capable of defending himself or herself and has
the mental and physical capacity to practice law,
the disciplinary proceedings resume.
(B) Capacity To Defend with Counsel. If the hearing
officer or panel finds that the respondent is not
capable of defending himself or herself in the
disciplinary proceedings but is capable of
adequately assisting counsel in the defense, the
supplemental proceedings are dismissed and the
disciplinary proceedings resume. If counsel does
not appear on behalf of the respondent within 20
days of service of the hearing officer’s decision,
the Chair must appoint a member of the Association
as counsel for the respondent in the disciplinary
proceeding.
(C) Finding of Incapacity. If the hearing officer or
panel finds that the respondent either does not
have the mental or physical capacity to practice
law, or is incapable of assisting counsel in
properly defending a disciplinary proceeding
because of mental or physical incapacity, the
hearing officer or panel must recommend that the
respondent be transferred to disability inactive
status. The procedures for appeal and review of
suspension recommendations apply to recommendations
for transfer to disability inactive status.
(8) Transfer Following Board Review.
(A) The Board must enter an order immediately
transferring the respondent to disability inactive
status if after review of a hearing officer’s or
panel’s recommendation of transfer to disability
inactive status, the Board finds that the
respondent:
(i) does not have the mental or physical capacity
to practice law; or
(ii) is incapable of assisting counsel in
properly defending a disciplinary proceeding
because of mental or physical incapacity.
(B) The transfer is effective upon service of the order
on the respondent under rule 4.1.
(e) Interim Suspension. When supplemental proceedings have
been ordered, disciplinary counsel must petition the Supreme
Court for the respondent’s interim suspension under rule
7.2(a)(1) or seek automatic suspension under rule 7.3 unless
the respondent is already suspended on an interim basis.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2002.]
Click here to view in a PDF.
|
| Courts | Organizations | News | Opinions | Rules | Forms | Directory | Library |
| Back to Top | Privacy and Disclaimer Notices |