RULE 33
INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES
(a) Availability; Procedures for Use. Any party may serve upon any
other party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or,
if the party served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or
association or governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall
furnish such information as is available to the party. Interrogatories may,
without leave of court, be served upon the plaintiff after the summons and
a copy of the complaint are served upon the defendant, or the complaint is
filed, whichever shall first occur, and upon any other party with or after
service of the summons and complaint upon that party.
Interrogatories shall be so arranged that after each separate question
there shall appear a blank space reasonably calculated to enable the
answering party to place the written response. In the event the responding
party either chooses to place the response on a separate page or pages or
must do so in order to complete the response, the responding party shall
clearly denote the number of the question to which the response relates,
including the subpart thereof if applicable. Each interrogatory shall be
answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected
to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated in lieu of an
answer. The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the
objections signed by the attorney making them. The party upon whom the
interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the answers, and
objections if any, within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories,
except that a defendant may serve answers or objections within 40 days
after service of the summons and complaint upon that defendant. The parties
may stipulate or any party may move for an order under rule 37(a) with
respect to any objection to or other failure to answer an interrogatory.
(b) Scope; Use at Trial. Interrogatories may relate to any matters
which can be inquired into under rule 26(b), and the answers may be used to
the extent permitted by the Rules of Evidence.
An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable
merely because an answer to the interrogatory involves an opinion or
contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the
court may order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until after
designated discovery has been completed or until a pretrial conference or
other later time.
An interrogatory otherwise proper is not objectionable merely because
the propounding party may have other access to the requested information or
has the burden of proof on the subject matter of the interrogatory at
trial.
(c) Option To Produce Business Records. Where the answer to an
interrogatory may be derived or ascertained from the business records of
the party upon whom the interrogatory has been served or from an
examination, audit or inspection of such business records, or from a
compilation, abstract or summary based thereon, and the burden of deriving
or ascertaining the answer is substantially the same for the party serving
the interrogatory as for the party served, it is sufficient answer to such
interrogatory to specify the records from which the answer may be derived
or ascertained and to afford to the party serving the interrogatory
reasonable opportunity to examine, audit or inspect such records and to
make copies, compilations, abstracts or summaries. A specification shall be
in sufficient detail to permit the interrogating party to locate and to
identify, as readily as can the party served, the records from which the
answer may be ascertained.
Click here to view in a PDF.
|
| Courts | Organizations | News | Opinions | Rules | Forms | Directory | Library |
| Back to Top | Privacy and Disclaimer Notices |