ETHICS ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATE OF WASHINGTON OPINION NO. 86-13 QUESTION Is it proper for a judge’s spouse to work as a volunteer probation person in the same court as the judge sits? Would the answer be any different if the spouse/volunteer probation person were assigned to another District Court in the same county? ANSWER Our answer is premised on the following representations made to the committee: 1) although the position is unpaid, the spouse/probation worker performs all the services of a paid probation officer; 2) the court has two other judges and the spouse is not permitted to work on the case of any defendant sentenced by the judge/spouse; 3) in the capacity of probation worker, the spouse uses her maiden name although not for any other purposes; 4) the District Court Probation Department is managed by a director who has the ultimate responsibility for hiring and firing all employees, but individual probation workers are assigned to various courts on a fairly permanent basis; and 5) which probation department is under the direct supervision of the District Court. A judge does not violate the Code of Judicial Conduct when a fellow judge’s spouse works as a volunteer probation person in the same court as the judge sits. CJC Canon 2 requires a judge to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety and also requires a judge not allow social or other relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment. CJC Canon 3 (C)(1)(d) requires the judge to disqualify himself or herself where the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned. The committee’s opinion is that under some circumstances the marital relationship between a fellow judge and he volunteer probation worker might give rise to a circumstance wherein the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned. It is the committee’s opinion that the proper course of action for a judge faced with assigning or having responsibility for assigning to a defendant a probation worker who is the spouse of a fellow judge in he same court would be to notify the defendant of that relationship and to seriously consider a request for the assignment of another probation worker to the defendant’s case if the defendant chooses to make such a request.