Skip Page LinksWelcome to Washington State Courts
Courts Home> Judicial Information System
 

116 - Display of Charge Title Without Modifier of Attempt

 
Request Status Summary
Request Status Authorized
Request Detail
Requestor Name:
   Alfasso, Lynne R
Origination Date:
   09/23/2011
    
Recommended Endorser:
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Request Type: Change or Enhancement
Which Systems are affected? Judicial Information System (JIS)
Superior Court Management Information System (SCOMIS)
Judicial Access Browser System (JABS)
Business Area: Records Management
Communities Impacted: Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
Juvenile Court Administrators
Public and Other Users
Impact if not Resolved: Medium
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity

The DCH and ICH screens will only display one line of text in the "short title" column which results in an incomplete offense title.  When a person is charged with an attempted crime, the information system requires two lines of text.  The first line displays the underlying crime and RCW (burglary, for example) and the second line displays the attempt and related RCW (RCW 9A.28.020).  In the DCH and ICH screens, it shows that the title of the crime the person was convicted of was the underlying crime and not display the attempt. 

Charging an attempt reduces a crime by one seriousness level.  For example, it reduces a Class B felony to a Class C and a Class C felony to a gross misdemeanor.

if the customer drills down to a more comprehensive view of the case, the display of information is complete. Two lines of text will be displayed for the crime and so it is clear that the defendant was only convicted of the attempt.  If a customer using SCOMIS views the Display Charge screen, it will display the attempt.  If the customer using JABS drills down to the Summary of the case, it will also display the attempt modifier.

Customers who rely on the display of information in the DCH or the ICH see incomplete information.

I have attached examples of screens from an actual case in RN 110324-000026.

Attachment 1 is the DCH screen, which appears to show that a guilty plea was entered on two charges of Assault 3 Law Enforcement Officer, which is a Class C felony.  Attachment 2 is the ICH screen from JABS which shows similar information.

Attachment 3 is the SCOMIS Display Charge screen, which displays two lines of text and shows that the Guilty was entered on the Attempted crimes (which are gross misdemeanors) from the first amended complaint. Attachment 4 is the Case Summary from JABS, which also shows that the Guilty result was on the Attempts in the amended complaint.  So, the system contains the correct information on what happened in this case, but on two screens the information displays in a way that customers may not expect.

My guess is that this may also occur when a person is charged with solicitation to commit an underlying crime (RCW 9A.28.030) or conspiracy to commit an underlying crime (RCW 9A.28.040) but I have not seen actual cases involving a solicitation or conspiracy charge.  They are charged similarly to attempt, though, with two RCW sections--that of the underlying offense and that of the modifier.

Expected Benefit:

Customers will obtain more complete information from the DCH and ICH screens.

Endorsement Detail
Endorsing Committee
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Endorser Name:
   Morford, Heather T on behalf of AOC endorsing group
Origination Date:
   12/15/2011
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
AOC Analysis Detail
Analysis Date: 01/19/2012
Request Rationale
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: Yes
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: Yes
Breadth of Solution Benefit: Wide
Cost Estimates
Cost to Implement? 340 hours
Feasibility Study needed? No
Court Level User Group
Multi-level CLUG
Approving Authority Administrator
Request Summary:

This request seeks to change how charges on attempted crimes are displayed of the Defendant Criminal History (DCH) and Individual Criminal History (ICH) screens in the Judicial Information System (JIS).  When an individual is charged with an attempted crime, JIS requires two lines of text.  The first line shows the underlying crime and the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) citation.  The second line contains the attempt modifier and the RCW citation for attempt, 9A.28.020.  Currently, the DCH and ICH screens only show the first line of the charge, which is incomplete information.  If a customer uses the Display Charge screen in the Superior Court Management Information System (SCOMIS), the attempt modifier is displayed.  If a customer using the Judicial Access Browser System (JABS) selects the summary of the case, it will also display the attempt modifier.  This request seeks to change the system(s) so that both lines of the charge are displayed on DCH and ICH.

Business Impacts:

This change will provide more complete information to customers who utilize the DCH and ICH screens in JIS.

Summary of Proposed Solution

The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) would modify the DCH and ICH screens to display the primary charge with an anticipatory modifier on all convictions.  In addition, AOC would also modify JABS to display the charge with modifier.

Proposed Solution

AOC proposes to modify the DCH and ICH screens in JIS to display the primary charge with  anticipatory modifier.  This will add a second line to all charges which have a modifier included.  If the charge on DCH and ICH does not have a modifier, the screens will only display the one line charge.  JABS will also be modified to include this information on two ICH screens.

Additional Systems Affected
Judicial Information System (JIS)
Judicial Access Browser System (JABS)
Communities Impacted
Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
Juvenile Court Administrators
Public and Other Users
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
Endorsing Committee
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Endorser Name:
   Williams, Heather on behalf of AOC Endorsing Group
Origination Date:
   02/01/2012
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
CLUG Multi-level CLUG
Chair of Group Rich Johnson
Date of Decision 03/07/2012
Decision
Decision to Recommend for Approval Unamimously recommended to the approving authority
Priority Processing Status Prioritized
Ranking
Request Priority 4
Request Importance Medium
Scoring Detail Score / Possible
Business Value 9 / 10
Relative Priority 6 / 10
Cost 5 /  5
Complexity/Level of Effort 10 / 10
Risk 5 /  5
Benefit / Impact 4 /  5
Impact of Doing Nothing 4 /  5
Total Score 43 / 50
Implementation Detail
Analysis Date: 12/18/2012
Implementation Stage Authorized
Prioritization Option: Non-Prioritized
Comments:

This request was authorized by Callie Dietz on December 17, 2012.  Pending scheduling.

 
 
Courts | Organizations | News | Opinions | Rules | Forms | Directory | Library 
Back to Top | Privacy and Disclaimer Notices