| |
141 - Add Bond Transferred Disposition Code
|
|
| Request Status Summary |
| Request Status |
Authorized |
|
| Request Detail |
| Requestor Name: |
| |
Ammons, Kevin |
| Origination Date: |
| |
03/13/2012 |
| |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
| |
Codes Committee |
|
| Original Title: |
CODES REQUEST - Add Bond Transferred Disposition Code |
| Request Type: |
Change or Enhancement
|
| Which Systems are affected? |
Judicial Information System (JIS)
|
| Business Area: |
Court Case Management
|
| Communities Impacted: |
Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
Superior Court Administrators
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
|
| Impact if not Resolved: |
Medium |
|
|
| What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
Create a code of T for Bond Transferred to record the transfer of a bond between CLJ and Superior Courts.The request is to have this code available to document that the bond was transferred to another court. The code should behave the same as E - Exonerated by removing the bond from the trust on the case and making a docket entry that states that it was transferred. |
| Expected Benefit: |
This will more accurately reflect the actual disposition. |
| Endorsement Detail
|
| Endorsing Committee |
| |
Codes Committee |
| Endorser Name: |
| |
Ammons, Kevin on behalf of the Codes Committee |
| Origination Date: |
| |
03/13/2012 |
|
| Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
| Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
This request was approved by the Codes Committee on March 13, 2012. |
|
|
| AOC Analysis Detail
|
| Analysis Date: |
05/10/2012
|
| Request Rationale |
| Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
| Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
| Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Wide |
| Cost Estimates |
| Cost to Implement? |
135 hours |
| Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
| Court Level User Group |
| Multi-level CLUG |
| Approving Authority |
CIO |
|
| Request Summary: |
This request, as approved by the Codes Committee, is to create a code of “T” for Bond Transferred to record the transfer of a bond between Courts of Limited Jurisdiction and Superior Courts. The request is to have this code available to document that the bond was transferred to another court. The code should behave the same as E - Exonerated by removing the bond from the trust on the case and making a docket entry that states that it was transferred. |
| Business Impacts: |
This change will make the new code available to users. |
| Summary of Proposed Solution |
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) will add the code to JIS (DISCIS). |
| Proposed Solution |
AOC will research the function of the E – Exonerated code and use that code as the basis for the new code. The technical team will identify any differences in functionality required between the existing code and the new code. The code will then be developed and tested to ensure proper functionality. |
| Additional Systems Affected |
Judicial Information System (JIS)
|
| Communities Impacted |
Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
Superior Court Administrators
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
|
|
|
| Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
| Endorsing Committee |
| |
Codes Committee |
| Endorser Name: |
| |
Ammons, Kevin on behalf of the Codes Committee |
| Origination Date: |
| |
05/10/2012 |
|
| Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
|
|
| Court Level User Group Decision Detail
|
| CLUG |
Multi-level CLUG |
| Chair of Group |
Richard Johnson |
| Date of Decision |
01/16/2013 |
| Decision |
| Decision to Recommend for Approval |
Unamimously recommended to the approving authority |
| Priority Processing Status |
Prioritized |
| Ranking |
| Request Priority |
6 |
| Request Importance |
Medium |
|
| Scoring Detail |
|
In making their decision, detailed score values were not provided by Multi-level CLUG.
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
| Implementation Stage |
Authorized |
| Prioritization Option: |
Non-Prioritized |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Authorized by the CIO on March 28, 2013. Pending scheduling.
|
|
|
|
|
