| |
58 - CLJ Warrant – Print Page
|
|
| Request Status Summary |
| Request Status |
In Progress |
|
| Request Detail |
| Requestor Name: |
| |
Springer, Pam K |
| Origination Date: |
| |
12/09/2010 |
| |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
| |
District and Municipal Court Management Association |
|
| Original Title: |
Enchance JIS to allow bench warrants to print on plain paper |
| Request Type: |
Change or Enhancement
|
| Which Systems are affected? |
Judicial Information System (JIS)
|
| Business Area: |
Warrants
|
| Communities Impacted: |
CLJ Managers
|
| Impact if not Resolved: |
Medium |
|
|
| What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
Superior Court use regular paper and a word doc to create warrants, I would like the JIS system to create a format to allow warrants to print on plain paper, rather than a printed form. |
| Expected Benefit: |
Using plain paper would save court budgets funds now spent on warrant of arrest forms. This would also save staff time when processing the warrants after printing. |
| Endorsement Detail
|
| Endorsing Committee |
| |
District and Municipal Court Management Association |
| Endorser Name: |
| |
Vance, Aimee R |
| Origination Date: |
| |
12/13/2010 |
|
| Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
| Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
The group would like to make a request to keep current functionality so that multi-part forms that have already been purchased can still be used until the supply is exhausted. |
|
|
| AOC Analysis Detail
|
| Analysis Date: |
02/04/2011
|
| Request Rationale |
| Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
| Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
| Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Wide |
| Cost Estimates |
| Cost to Implement? |
296 hours |
| Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
| Court Level User Group |
| Courts of Limited Jurisdiction |
| Approving Authority |
CIO |
|
| Request Summary: |
This request is for an enhancement to JIS to allow Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (CLJ) to print warrants on plain paper rather than a printed form. |
| Business Impacts: |
This enhancement would reduce the amount of money courts expend on pre-printed arrest forms. |
| Summary of Proposed Solution |
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) would use the current warrant form and content to allow courts to print on plain paper. Courts would not have to select an option each time they print. Instead, AOC would set a default for each court. As a court exhausted its supply of pre-printed forms, they would inform AOC and the default would be changed to plain paper for that court. |
| Proposed Solution |
AOC would use the current form and content, reformatted to fit an 8.5” x 11” sheet with data labels. AOC will provide the option to print on pre-printed warrant forms for an indefinite period until all courts have exhausted their supplies of pre-printed forms. |
|
|
| Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
| Endorsing Committee |
| |
District and Municipal Court Management Association |
| Endorser Name: |
| |
Vance, Aimee R |
| Origination Date: |
| |
02/11/2011 |
|
| Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
|
|
| Court Level User Group Decision Detail
|
| CLUG |
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction |
| Chair of Group |
Cynthia Marr |
| Date of Decision |
02/17/2011 |
| Decision |
| Decision to Recommend for Approval |
Unamimously recommended to the approving authority |
| Priority Processing Status |
Prioritized |
| Ranking |
| Request Priority |
5 |
| Request Importance |
High |
|
| Scoring Detail |
Score / Possible |
| Business Value |
8.7 / 10 |
| Relative Priority |
7.8 / 10 |
| Cost |
4.3 / 5 |
| Complexity/Level of Effort |
9 / 10 |
| Risk |
4.8 / 5 |
| Benefit / Impact |
4.8 / 5 |
| Impact of Doing Nothing |
.5 / 5 |
| Total Score |
39.9 / 50 |
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
03/24/2011 |
| Implementation Stage |
Authorized |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Authorized by Vonnie Diseth on Mar 23, 2011.
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
04/01/2011 |
| Implementation Stage |
Scheduled |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
This request is scheduled for May 23 - Aug 31, 2011.
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
| Implementation Stage |
In Progress |
| Prioritization Option: |
Non-Prioritized |
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
| Implementation Stage |
Scheduled |
| Prioritization Option: |
Prioritized |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
The release has been rescheduled for Oct 17, 2011.
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
| Implementation Stage |
Scheduled |
| Prioritization Option: |
Non-Prioritized |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
The release has been rescheduled for Oct 17, 2011.
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
| Implementation Stage |
In Progress |
| Prioritization Option: |
Non-Prioritized |
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
| Implementation Stage |
Scheduled |
| Prioritization Option: |
Non-Prioritized |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
During the week of September 19, 2011, ISD discovered that stock warrant forms are pre-printed with county name for certain district and municipal courts. This was not identified in the initial requirements. Mark Oldenburg solicited courts to determine if ‘County of xxxxxxx, State of Washington’ should print on plain paper warrants. From these discussions it was determined that AOC will provide an option for the courts to either print or not print the ‘County of xxxxxx, State of Washington’ on plain paper warrants.
Because of the new requirement the implementation date has changed from 10/17/2011 to 11/07/2011.
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
| Implementation Stage |
In Progress |
| Prioritization Option: |
Non-Prioritized |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
This request is in-progress.
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
| Implementation Stage |
In Progress |
| Prioritization Option: |
Non-Prioritized |
|
|
Comments:
|
|
This project was originally scheduled to conclude on Aug 31, 2011. The enhancement is being re-developed to correct an error discovered before release. Pending rescheduling.
|
|
|
|
|
