| |
71 - SCOMIS Case-Reopen Functionality
|
|
| Request Status Summary |
| Request Status |
Awaiting CLUG Recommendation |
|
| Request Detail |
| Requestor Name: |
| |
Christopher, Jenni |
| Origination Date: |
| |
02/03/2011 |
| |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
| |
Washington State Association of County Clerks |
|
| Request Type: |
Change or Enhancement
|
| Which Systems are affected? |
Superior Court Management Information System (SCOMIS)
|
| Business Area: |
Case/Referral Filing and Maintenance
|
| Communities Impacted: |
Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
Superior Court Administrators
|
| Impact if not Resolved: |
Medium |
| Impact Description: |
The lack of such functionality means that courts have no appropriate mechanism for recording and managing reopened cases. This creates a serious problem for:
- case management (tracking of active cases)
- workload analysis
- caseload reporting (undercounts)
- time-standards and other court-performance monitoring (artifically prolonged case durations)
- the development of appropriate audit standards by the Best Practices Committee
- identification and aggregating of family-related cases for management of those matters in Unified Family Court
|
|
|
| What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
Overview
Case reopen is defined as the reactivation of a case following resolution, for recording and management of additional court activity. A case may have zero to many reopenings. Each life cycle may involve different attorneys, a new filing date, new/different issues, new court activity, and a different caseflow-management track. A reopened case is pending, and must again be managed through the case cycle from filing to closure. All previous history must be retained intact, and information from the new cycle appended. Functional requirements include: retaining the same case number across all life cycles; separating and tracking new events (including accounting); separating new data such as (but not limited to) filing date, resolution and completion information, and party names into the appropriate reopened case cycle; no restrictions on the causes of action in a reopened case. Examples of reopened cases include: dissolution modifications, remands for readjudication following appeal, reopens following vacation of judgment. Additional possibilities include probation violations, contempt proceedings, and guardianship change to estate cases.
Detailed requirements (as determined by a 1996 Superior Court Workgroup on reopened cases) are presented in the attached document.
|
| Expected Benefit: |
Superior court cases (and case data) will correctly reflect the multiple "lives/cycles" cases can go through. As necessary for litigants and attorneys, a modification will appear with the same case number and title as the original case to which it applies, yet filing date, dispositional information, and accounting data will be recorded and retained separately for the modification--not over-writing/displacing the original case's data. This will allow an integrated and accurate picture of cases, will facilitate appropriate case management of modifications, and will allow accurate reporting on workload, caseload, pending matters, and time-standards performance. |
| Any Additional Information: |
Case-reopen functionality has been an outstanding Superior Court request since 1992. It has been studied by a number of court committees, and all have concluded the functionality is needed. |
| Endorsement Detail
|
| Endorsing Committee |
| |
Washington State Association of County Clerks |
| Endorser Name: |
| |
Gould, Betty J |
| Origination Date: |
| |
02/23/2011 |
|
| Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
|
|
| AOC Analysis Detail
|
| Analysis Date: |
05/26/2011
|
| Request Rationale |
| Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
| Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
| Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Wide |
| Cost Estimates |
| Cost to Implement? |
18,400 hours |
| Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
| Court Level User Group |
| Superior Courts |
|
| Request Summary: |
This request seeks to enhance Superior Court Management Information System (SCOMIS) to allow cases to be reopened. “Case reopen” is defined as the reactivation of a case following resolution, for recording and management of additional court activity. A case may have zero to many re-openings. Each life cycle may involve different attorneys, a new filing date, new/ different issues, new court activity, and a different case flow management track. A reopened case is pending, and must again be managed through the case cycle from filing to closure. All previous history must be retained intact, and information from the new cycle appended. |
| Business Impacts: |
Superior Court cases will correctly reflect the multiple lifecycles that cases can go through. When needed, a modification will appear with the same case number and title as the resolved case to which it is associated. The reopened case’s filing date, dispositional information, and accounting data will be recorded and retained separately, the reopened case’s data will not overwrite or displace the original case's data. This solution will allow an integrated and accurate picture of cases, will facilitate appropriate case management of modifications, and will allow accurate reporting on workload, caseload, pending matters, and time-standards performance. |
| Summary of Proposed Solution |
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) would design and implement a means to file and manage a “reopened” superior court case with its own lifecycle and to have that “reopened” case associated with one or more previously resolved case(s). All JIS applications would recognize the association of the “reopened” cases to the previously resolved case(s). |
| Proposed Solution |
AOC would modify SCOMIS to enable to court to reopen superior court cases and to maintain them through their lifecycle. This would affect about 90% of SCOMIS modules, as well affecting other JIS systems, including: JIS, JABS, JCS, JRS, ACORDS, CAPS, Electronic Disposition, and the Data Warehouse. |
| Additional Systems Affected |
Appellate Court System (ACORDS)
Judicial Information System (JIS)
Superior Court Management Information System (SCOMIS)
Court Automated Proceeding System (CAPS)
Data Warehouse
Juvenile and Corrections System (JCS)
Judicial Receipting System (JRS)
Judicial Access Browser System (JABS)
Other
|
| Communities Impacted |
Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
Superior Court Administrators
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
Juvenile Court Administrators
State Agencies
Public and Other Users
|
|
|
| Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
| Endorsing Committee |
| |
Washington State Association of County Clerks |
| Endorser Name: |
| |
Gould, Betty J |
| Origination Date: |
| |
09/23/2011 |
|
| Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
|
|
|
|