Note: This opinion is no longer available on this site. To find the official opinion go the Washington State Judicial Opinions Website
Supreme Court of the State of Washington
Opinion Information Sheet
Docket Number: |
82200-0 |
Title of Case: |
Bradburn v. N. Cent. Reg'l Library Dist. |
File Date: |
05/06/2010 |
Oral Argument Date: |
06/23/2009 |
SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
Judgment or order under review |
JUSTICES
--------
Barbara A. Madsen | Majority Author | |
Charles W. Johnson | Signed Majority | |
Gerry L. Alexander | Signed Majority | |
Richard B. Sanders | Signed Dissent | |
Tom Chambers | Dissent Author | |
Susan Owens | Signed Majority | |
Mary E. Fairhurst | Signed Majority | |
James M. Johnson | Concurrence Author | |
Debra L. Stephens | Signed Dissent | |
COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------
Counsel for Plaintiff(s) |
| Duncan Emerson Manville |
| Savitt Bruce & Willey LLP |
| 1325 4th Ave Ste 1410 |
| Seattle, WA, 98101-2505 |
|
| Sarah a Dunne |
| ACLU |
| 705 2nd Ave Ste 300 |
| Seattle, WA, 98104-1723 |
|
| Catherine Crump |
| American Civil Liberties |
| 125 Broad Street |
| Seventh Floor |
| New York, NY, 10004 |
Counsel for Defendant(s) |
| Thomas Dean Adams |
| Karr Tuttle Campbell |
| 1201 3rd Ave Ste 2900 |
| Seattle, WA, 98101-3028 |
|
| Celeste Mountain Monroe |
| Karr Tuttle Campbell |
| 1201 3rd Ave Ste 2900 |
| Seattle, WA, 98101-3028 |
Amicus Curiae on behalf of Electronic Frontier Foundation |
| Lee Tien |
| Electronic Frontier Foundation |
| 454 Shotwell Street |
| San Francisco, CA, 94110 |
|
| Venkat Balasubramani |
| Focal PLLC |
| 8426 40th Ave Sw |
| Seattle, WA, 98136-2350 |
Amicus Curiae on behalf of Center for Democracy & Technology |
| Venkat Balasubramani |
| Focal PLLC |
| 8426 40th Ave Sw |
| Seattle, WA, 98136-2350 |
|
| John Morris |
| Center for Democracy & Technology |
| 1634 I Street Nw #1100 |
| Washington, DC, 20006 |
|
| Cynthia Wong |
| Center for Democracy & Technology |
| 1634 I Street Nw #1100 |
| Washington, DC, 20006 |
View the Slip Opinion(s) Filed for this Case.
View a Printer Friendly Version of this Opinion Information Sheet.
|