102 - Courts of Limited Jurisdiction Case Management System

 
Request Status Summary
Request Status In Progress
JISC Priority 1
Status Comment 10/14/2019 JISC re-prioritized this request number 1 on the JISC Priorities.
Request Detail
Requestor Name:
   Jacobs, Lynne M
Origination Date:
   07/08/2011
    
Recommended Endorser:
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Original Title: Request for new case management system to replace JIS.
Request Type: New System
Which Systems are affected? Judicial Information System (JIS)
Business Area: Other
Communities Impacted: CLJ Managers
Impact if not Resolved: High
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity

On behalf of the DMCMA I am formally submitting a request for a new case management study to replace JIS. Please reference the July 7, 2011 letter to the JISC.

Expected Benefit:

Please reference the July 7, 2011 letter to the JISC.

Endorsement Detail
Endorsing Committee
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Endorser Name:
   Vance, Aimee R
Origination Date:
   07/19/2011
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
AOC Analysis Detail
Analysis Date: 09/29/2011
Request Rationale
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: Yes
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: Yes
Breadth of Solution Benefit: Wide
Cost Estimates
Cost to Implement? 4,656 hours plus $200,000 contract costs
Feasibility Study needed? Yes
Court Level User Group
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction
Approving Authority JISC
Request Summary:

A new system needs to be provided with the functionality to support the Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (CLJ). The majority of district and municipal courts in the state do not have the ability to purchase their own case management systems and need a common system that can be used by all of the courts. The request seeks a new case management system that would be beneficial to all courts.

Business Impacts:

This feasibility study will provide crucial information in determining the best approach to modernizing the case management system AOC provides the district and municipal courts throughout the state.

AOC estimates that court staff would need to dedicate approximately 200 to 400 person hours over the course of the feasibility study to aid in development and review of requirements.

No current systems would be modified or affected by this feasibility study.

Summary of Proposed Solution

Replacing a major legacy system would be a multi-year effort and a multi-million dollar investment. For a project of this size and complexity, a feasibility study is necessary for due diligence and to gain a better of understanding of associated costs and project risks. The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) would begin by conducting a feasibility study to gather and document high-level business requirements for the CLJs. AOC will also solicit information from vendors to determine if systems exist in the market space to meet the needs of the courts. The specific elements included in a feasibility study can be provided upon request. The sizing below represents only the costs for the feasibility study.

Proposed Solution

AOC would conduct a feasibility study to determine if one or more of the existing vendors in this market space is mature enough and can meet the business needs of the CLJ courts. This study would be based on the same model used for ITG 002 – Superior Court Case Management System Feasibility Study. High level requirement will be gathered to provide vendors information on the CLJ business needs. The high level requirements will also be used to establish scope for an implementation project. Work that has also been done in previous case management system efforts, including the current Superior Court Case Management System effort, will be leveraged in support of this feasibility study. The feasibility study will examine the capability of vendors in the market space to determine if products are available that can meet the requirements to provide a system to the CLJ courts. The information obtained during this feasibility study could then be used to support procurement of a system, if the JISC decides to proceed with a system replacement.

Additional Systems Affected
Other
Communities Impacted
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
Endorsing Committee
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Endorser Name:
   Vance, Aimee R
Origination Date:
   10/04/2011
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
CLUG Courts of Limited Jurisdiction
Chair of Group Cynthia Marr
Date of Decision 10/20/2011
Decision
Decision to Recommend for Approval Unamimously recommended to the approving authority
Priority Processing Status Prioritized
Ranking
Request Priority 1
Request Importance High
Scoring Detail Score / Possible
Business Value 10 / 10
Relative Priority 10 / 10
Cost 0 /  5
Complexity/Level of Effort 0 / 10
Risk 4 /  5
Benefit / Impact 5 /  5
Impact of Doing Nothing 5 /  5
Total Score 34 / 50
Implementation Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage Authorized
Prioritization Option: Prioritized
Comments:

This request was authorized by the JISC at their December 2, 2011 meeting.

Implementation Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage In Progress
Prioritization Option: Non-Prioritized
Implementation Detail
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage In Progress
Prioritization Option: Prioritized
 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S3