|
1388 - MANDATE - Phase 2 - Protection Order Document Sharing for Judicial Officers Statewide
|
|
Request Status Summary |
Request Status |
In Progress |
|
Request Detail |
Requestor Name: |
|
Ammons, Kevin |
Origination Date: |
|
01/09/2025 |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
|
Request Type: |
Mandated Change
Mandated Change
|
Which Systems are affected? |
Judicial Access Browser System (JABS)
Other
|
Other affected Systems / Business Processes |
EDR, CLJ-CMS, CLJ Courts not migrating to CLJ-CMS |
Business Area: |
Orders
|
Communities Impacted: |
Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Appellate Court Judges
Superior Court Judges
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
|
Impact if not Resolved: |
High |
Impact Description: |
HB 1320 stipulates that Protection Order document be shared between courts for Judicial decision making. The deadline for implementing a solution to share Protection Order documents for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction is January 1, 2026.
|
|
|
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
Background:
A 20-member technical workgroup, from the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), King County, and Pierce County, was put together to discuss and provide solutions to the question of how to provide judicial officers statewide with access to protection order documents and data from superior courts, courts of limited jurisdiction, tribal courts, and military courts. First it is important to understand that the technical landscape for the Washington State judiciary is quite complex and challenging because Washington State is a non-unified courts system. Several trial courts have opted to implement their own case management and document management systems rather than use the state provided case and document management systems. Therefore, sharing protection order documents amongst these separate systems residing on document servers outside of the AOC is very challenging to implement. However, after several meetings with some of the larger non-JIS courts, AOC is proposing the following solution to resolve this issue.
Access to Protection Order Documents Statewide:
Solution: The AOC implemented a solution that addresses all trial courts in Washington State including those with their own separate document management systems. The solution is a secured, centralized resource proxy at the AOC used by the Judicial Access Browser System (JABS) via a hyper-link to request and obtain protection order documents from the courts using their own external document management systems. AOC acts as the “broker” to proxy the requests made by judicial officers to see a protection order document from one county to another simply by clicking on a hyper-link in JABS. By clicking on the link, JABS goes to the individual courts DMS to view the document. The protection order documents continue to be secured and stored locally at the court and not at the AOC. This solution simplifies the work that is needed from the technical staff in the Non-JIS courts as they will only need to open up their network ports to talk with one trusted end-point which is within the AOC and they do not have to open their network ports to the rest of the courts statewide. This solution to display Superior Court protection order documents statewide was implemented for the Superior Courts on or about January 1, 2023. Now, the implementation at the CLJs will proceed. The CLJ's must provide access to protection orders filed in their courts by January 1, 2026.
|
Expected Benefit: |
This solution/service provides secure centralized access to protection order documents hosted on individual court systems. This solution simplifies the work that is needed to be done by the technical staff in the Non-JIS courts as they will only need to open up their network ports to talk with one trusted end-point which is within the AOC and they would not have to open their network ports to the rest of the courts statewide.
|
Endorsement Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
Endorser Name: |
|
Escudero, Arsenio on behalf of AOC Endorsement Group |
Origination Date: |
|
01/09/2025 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
Mandated ITG
|
|
|
AOC Analysis Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
01/09/2025
|
Request Rationale |
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Narrow |
Cost Estimates |
Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
Court Level User Group |
Non-JIS |
Approving Authority |
CIO |
|
Request Summary: |
HB 1320 stipulates that Protection Order document be shared between courts for Judicial decision making. The deadline for implementing a solution to share Protection Order
documents for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction is January 1, 2026.
|
Business Impacts: |
A 20-member technical workgroup, from the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), King County, and Pierce County, was put together to discuss and provide solutions to the question of how to provide judicial officers statewide with access to protection order documents and data
from superior courts, courts of limited jurisdiction, tribal courts, and military courts. First it is important to understand that the technical landscape for the Washington State judiciary is quite complex and challenging because Washington State is a non-unified courts system. Several trial courts have opted to implement their own case management and document management systems rather than use the state provided case and
document management systems. Therefore, sharing protection order documents amongst these separate systems residing on document servers outside of the AOC is very challenging to implement. However, after several meetings with some of the larger non-JIS courts, AOC is proposing the following solution to resolve this issue.
|
Summary of Proposed Solution |
This solution/service provides secure centralized access to protection order documents hosted on individual court systems. This solution simplifies the work that is needed to be done by the technical staff in the Non-JIS courts as they will only need to open up their network ports to talk with one trusted end-point which is within the AOC and they would not have to open their network ports to the rest of the courts statewide.
|
Proposed Solution |
The AOC implemented a solution that addresses all trial courts in Washington State including those with their own separate document management systems. The solution is a secured, centralized resource proxy at the AOC used by the Judicial Access Browser System (JABS) via a hyper-link to request and obtain protection order documents from the courts using their own external document management systems. AOC acts as the “broker” to proxy the requests made by judicial officers to see a protection order document from one county to another simply by clicking on a hyper-link in JABS. By clicking on the link, JABS goes to the individual courts DMS to view the document. The protection order documents continue to be secured and stored locally at the court and not at the AOC. This solution simplifies the work that is needed from the technical staff in the Non-JIS courts as they will only need to open up their network ports to talk with one trusted end-point which is within the
AOC and they do not have to open their network ports to the rest of the courts statewide. This solution to display Superior Court protection order documents statewide was implemented for the Superior Courts on or about January 1, 2023. Now, the implementation at the CLJs will proceed. The CLJ's must provide access to protection orders filed in their courts by January 1, 2026.
|
Additional Systems Affected |
Judicial Access Browser System (JABS)
Other
|
Communities Impacted |
Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Appellate Court Judges
Superior Court Judges
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
|
|
|
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
Endorser Name: |
|
Escudero, Arsenio on behalf of AOC Endorsement Group |
Origination Date: |
|
01/09/2025 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
Mandated ITG
|
|
|
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
|
CLUG |
Non-JIS |
Chair of Group |
Arsenio Escudero on behalf of Non-JIS CLUG |
Date of Decision |
01/09/2025 |
Decision |
Decision to Recommend for Approval |
Unamimously recommended to the approving authority |
Priority Processing Status |
Prioritized |
|
Scoring Detail |
In making their decision, detailed score values were not provided by Non-JIS.
|
|
Pros & Cons (if vote is not unanimous) |
NA
|
Additional Notes |
Mandated ITG
|
|
Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
Analysis Date: |
|
Implementation Stage
|
Authorized
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Prioritized
|
|
|
|
Implementation Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
|
Implementation Stage
|
In Progress
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Prioritized
|
|
|
|
|
|