1388 - MANDATE - Phase 2 - Protection Order Document Sharing for Judicial Officers Statewide

 
Request Status Summary
Request Status In Progress
Request Detail
Requestor Name:
   Ammons, Kevin
Origination Date:
   01/09/2025
    
Recommended Endorser:
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Request Type: Mandated Change
Mandated Change
Which Systems are affected? Judicial Access Browser System (JABS)
Other
Other affected Systems / Business Processes EDR, CLJ-CMS, CLJ Courts not migrating to CLJ-CMS
Business Area: Orders
Communities Impacted: Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Appellate Court Judges
Superior Court Judges
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
Impact if not Resolved: High
Impact Description:

HB 1320 stipulates that Protection Order document be shared between courts for Judicial decision making. The deadline for implementing a solution to share Protection Order documents for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction is January 1, 2026.

What is the Business Problem or Opportunity

Background:

A 20-member technical workgroup, from the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), King County, and Pierce County, was put together to discuss and provide solutions to the question of how to provide judicial officers statewide with access to protection order documents and data from superior courts, courts of limited jurisdiction, tribal courts, and military courts. First it is important to understand that the technical landscape for the Washington State judiciary is quite complex and challenging because Washington State is a non-unified courts system. Several trial courts have opted to implement their own case management and document management systems rather than use the state provided case and document management systems. Therefore, sharing protection order documents amongst these separate systems residing on document servers outside of the AOC is very challenging to implement. However, after several meetings with some of the larger non-JIS courts, AOC is proposing the following solution to resolve this issue.

Access to Protection Order Documents Statewide:

Solution: The AOC implemented a solution that addresses all trial courts in Washington State including those with their own separate document management systems. The solution is a secured, centralized resource proxy at the AOC used by the Judicial Access Browser System (JABS) via a hyper-link to request and obtain protection order documents from the courts using their own external document management systems. AOC acts as the “broker” to proxy the requests made by judicial officers to see a protection order document from one county to another simply by clicking on a hyper-link in JABS. By clicking on the link, JABS goes to the individual courts DMS to view the document. The protection order documents continue to be secured and stored locally at the court and not at the AOC. This solution simplifies the work that is needed from the technical staff in the Non-JIS courts as they will only need to open up their network ports to talk with one trusted end-point which is within the AOC and they do not have to open their network ports to the rest of the courts statewide. This solution to display Superior Court protection order documents statewide was implemented for the Superior Courts on or about January 1, 2023. Now, the implementation at the CLJs will proceed. The CLJ's must provide access to protection orders filed in their courts by January 1, 2026.

Expected Benefit:

This solution/service provides secure centralized access to protection order documents hosted on individual court systems. This solution simplifies the work that is needed to be done by the technical staff in the Non-JIS courts as they will only need to open up their network ports to talk with one trusted end-point which is within the AOC and they would not have to open their network ports to the rest of the courts statewide.

Endorsement Detail
Endorsing Committee
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Endorser Name:
   Escudero, Arsenio on behalf of AOC Endorsement Group
Origination Date:
   01/09/2025
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments

Mandated ITG

AOC Analysis Detail
Analysis Date: 01/09/2025
Request Rationale
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: Yes
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: Yes
Breadth of Solution Benefit: Narrow
Cost Estimates
Feasibility Study needed? No
Court Level User Group
Non-JIS
Approving Authority CIO
Request Summary:

HB 1320 stipulates that Protection Order document be shared between courts for Judicial decision making. The deadline for implementing a solution to share Protection Order
documents for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction is January 1, 2026.

Business Impacts:

A 20-member technical workgroup, from the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), King County, and Pierce County, was put together to discuss and provide solutions to the question of how to provide judicial officers statewide with access to protection order documents and data
from superior courts, courts of limited jurisdiction, tribal courts, and military courts. First it is important to understand that the technical landscape for the Washington State judiciary is quite complex and challenging because Washington State is a non-unified courts system. Several trial courts have opted to implement their own case management and document management systems rather than use the state provided case and
document management systems. Therefore, sharing protection order documents amongst these separate systems residing on document servers outside of the AOC is very challenging to implement. However, after several meetings with some of the larger non-JIS courts, AOC is proposing the following solution to resolve this issue.

Summary of Proposed Solution

This solution/service provides secure centralized access to protection order documents hosted on individual court systems. This solution simplifies the work that is needed to be done by the technical staff in the Non-JIS courts as they will only need to open up their network ports to talk with one trusted end-point which is within the AOC and they would not have to open their network ports to the rest of the courts statewide.

Proposed Solution

The AOC implemented a solution that addresses all trial courts in Washington State including those with their own separate document management systems. The solution is a secured, centralized resource proxy at the AOC used by the Judicial Access Browser System (JABS) via a hyper-link to request and obtain protection order documents from the courts using their own external document management systems. AOC acts as the “broker” to proxy the requests made by judicial officers to see a protection order document from one county to another simply by clicking on a hyper-link in JABS. By clicking on the link, JABS goes to the individual courts DMS to view the document. The protection order documents continue to be secured and stored locally at the court and not at the AOC. This solution simplifies the work that is needed from the technical staff in the Non-JIS courts as they will only need to open up their network ports to talk with one trusted end-point which is within the
AOC and they do not have to open their network ports to the rest of the courts statewide. This solution to display Superior Court protection order documents statewide was implemented for the Superior Courts on or about January 1, 2023. Now, the implementation at the CLJs will proceed. The CLJ's must provide access to protection orders filed in their courts by January 1, 2026.

Additional Systems Affected
Judicial Access Browser System (JABS)
Other
Communities Impacted
Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Appellate Court Judges
Superior Court Judges
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
Endorsing Committee
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Endorser Name:
   Escudero, Arsenio on behalf of AOC Endorsement Group
Origination Date:
   01/09/2025
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments

Mandated ITG

Court Level User Group Decision Detail
CLUG Non-JIS
Chair of Group Arsenio Escudero on behalf of Non-JIS CLUG
Date of Decision 01/09/2025
Decision
Decision to Recommend for Approval Unamimously recommended to the approving authority
Priority Processing Status Prioritized
Scoring Detail
In making their decision, detailed score values were not provided by Non-JIS.
Pros & Cons (if vote is not unanimous)

NA

Additional Notes

Mandated ITG

Implementation Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage Authorized
Prioritization Option: Prioritized
Comments:

Mandated ITG

Implementation Detail
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage In Progress
Prioritization Option: Prioritized
 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S3