158 - Implementation of MAYSI 2

 
Request Status Summary
Request Status Completed
Status Comment MAYSI-2 available in JCS on 06/09/2016. Verified functionality with AOC Court Research on 08/23/2016.
Request Detail
Requestor Name:
   Veele-brice, Sarah
Origination Date:
   08/10/2012
    
Recommended Endorser:
   Washington Association of Juvenile Court Administrators
Original Title: Implementation of MAYSI-2
Request Type: New System
Which Systems are affected? Data Warehouse
Business Area: Records Management
Communities Impacted: Juvenile Court Administrators
Impact if not Resolved: Medium
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity

Overview:

The Washington State Juvenile Courts require access to validated mental health screening instruments for youth entering juvenile detention. There are two mental health and substance abuse screening tools, the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-2 (MAYSI-2) and the Mental Health- Juvenile Detention Assessment Tool (MH-JDAT) that the juvenile courts would like to have available through a server in all juvenile detention facilities. The MAYSI was developed in 1998 by Thomas Grisso, Ph.D., and Richard Barnum, M.D. and revised in 2000 to the MAYSI-2. The MAYSI-2 is a standardized 52-item, questionnaire The MH-JDAT was developed by Dr. Lisa Boesky in 2000 and is a standardized 31 - item questionnaire. Results from these instruments are used to identify signs of mental/emotional disturbance or distress, including suicide risk. In addition, scores from the MH-JDAT and the MAYSI-2 are used to inform decisions regarding access to programming, crisis intervention, and arrangements in detention.

Project background:

The juvenile courts and the Center for Court Research were in negotiations with an outside vendor, Assessments.com, to provide the MAYSI and MH-JDAT to the Washington Juvenile Detention Centers (see document MAYSI contract_draft.docx). Because of internal issues with Assessments.com, we have decided to explore other options for offering and housing the assessment tools. The McArthur Foundation has allocated funds to help expand the availability of the MAYSI-2 in all juvenile detention centers in Washington. These funds can be used to offset some of the costs of development and installation.

Need:

  • The functionality that we're particularly interested in:

  • MAYSI-2 and MH-JDAT tool made available electronically in all juvenile detention facilities in Washington State

  • Secure access to the tool (users are court staff)

  • Real time computation/scoring of tool

  • Real time report development (printable and PDF, mock ups attached in document MAYSI request.docx')

  • Data from multiple sites stored in a single secure location

  • Data can be extracted from server

  • Ability to query data on server and access a small number of developed canned reports.

External Sources for Service:

After investigation, it appears that Assessments.com is the only vendor that provides online software for the MAYSI-2. Additional vendors are able to load the MAYSI-2 (which is public access) on to a server to share. Estimates for this service were around $25-30K annually. The developers of the MAYSI have low cost software called MAYSIWARE (ww.maysiware.com/MAYSIWAREDEMO.html), but it is machine operated and not available for easy cross-site aggregation. There currently is no software available for the MH-JDAT. The Center for Court Research owns IBM software that has the functionality to collect and aggregate survey responses in to scores. This software may be a good fit for this project (see attachment F0502948IBM.pdf and IBM software descrip TG.docx for a description).

Request:

In order to meet the juvenile courts needs of having validated mental health screening tools available for all juvenile detention centers in the state it will be necessary to develop a process to complete the tools online with real-time scoring, data storage, and data retrieval. Developing a data entry portal, a scoring and reporting process, a data warehouse, along with ongoing warehouse maintenance will be necessary.

There are four major steps to this project,

1) Install the mental health screening tools on the AOC server. The Center for Court Research has IBM software that may be well suited for developing an online, user-friendly survey. While courts will likely only use one or the other tool, it is requested that both tools are available to all courts.

  1. The MAYSI-2 is available to the juvenile courts and has been approved by Dr. Tom Grisso to be installed on a server used and maintained by the courts. Attachment MAYSI-2.pdf is the instrument.

  2. The MH-JDAT has also been approved by its developer for use in Washington State Juvenile Detention Centers. Attached documents MH-JDAT final 2002.doc and JDAT Scoring System 9-2011.doc are the instrument and scoring guide for the MH-JDAT.

2) Make auto scoring and reporting possible.

3) Access to the tool should be secure. All data should be saved securely to the server. Ongoing maintenance of the application and the data will be necessary.

4) Make the data available for querying in BOXI by approved juvenile courts and the Center for Court Research. Develop minimal canned reports (less than 10) for courts to run.

Expected Benefit:

It is necessary for the juvenile courts to have access to screening tools that determine the mental health needs of the youth they detain. Having the tool in a central, secure location such as the AOC server will allow all courts to use the MAYSI-2 and/or MH-JDAT assessment tool, encouraging equity in services to youth throughout the state. In addition, saving all assessment data on a single server will allow for the expansion of local jurisdictions ability to track their needs for mental health services and the development of statewide tracking of juvenile detainees mental health needs.

Additionally, the juvenile courts will be able to use externally allocated resources (funds from the McArthur foundation) that will benefit the juvenile courts and the youth they serve.

Endorsement Detail
Endorsing Committee
   Washington Association of Juvenile Court Administrators
Endorser Name:
   Williams, Heather on behalf of WAJCA
Origination Date:
   08/27/2012
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments

This request was previously endorsed by WAJCA

AOC Analysis Detail
Analysis Date: 01/13/2014
Request Rationale
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: Yes
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: Yes
Breadth of Solution Benefit: Wide
Cost Estimates
Cost to Implement? 645 hours
Feasibility Study needed? No
Court Level User Group
Superior Courts
Approving Authority CIO
Request Summary:

The Washington State Juvenile Courts require access to validated mental-health screening instruments for youth entering juvenile detention. There are two mental-health and substance-abuse screening tools, the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-2 (MAYSI-2) and the Mental Health - Juvenile Detention Assessment Tool (MH-JDAT), that the juvenile courts would like to have available through a server in all juvenile-detention facilities. The MAYSI was developed in 1998 by Thomas Grisso, Ph.D., and Richard Barnum, M.D. and revised in 2000 to the MAYSI-2. The MAYSI-2 is a standardized 52-item questionnaire. The MH-JDAT was developed by Dr. Lisa Boesky in 2000 and is a standardized 31-item questionnaire. Results from these instruments are used to identify signs of mental/emotional disturbance or distress, including suicide risk. In addition, scores from the MH-JDAT and the MAYSI-2 are used to inform decisions regarding access to programming, crisis intervention, and arrangements in detention.

Business Impacts:

Juvenile courts will have access to screening tools that determine the mental health needs of the youth they detain.

A central, secure location for the tool, such as the AOC server, will allow all courts to use the MAYSI-2 and/or MH-JDAT assessment tool, encouraging equity in services to youth throughout the state.

Saving all assessment data on a single server will allow for: (1) the expansion of local jurisdictions' ability to track their needs for mental health services, and (2) the development of statewide tracking of juvenile detainees' mental health needs.

Externally allocated resources (funds from the MacArthur foundation) will be used to benefit the juvenile courts and the youth they serve.

Summary of Proposed Solution

Recommended Solution:

Option A (in-house development within ASRA) is recommended, for the following reasons:

Development within JIS would keep juvenile courts' tools from further splintering across multiple platforms.
Existing capabilities and infrastructure could be leveraged.
Development within ASRA allows for the required different security levels for different users.
Development within ASRA would allow for relatively quick testing and implementation subject, however, to availability of AOC's limited uniPaas resources.
This approach aligns with ISD standards which prioritize (1) re-use and (2) re-factor, over (3) buy and (4) build.

Proposed Solution

Option A: AOC Development within ASRA (Adult Static Risk Assessment)

Development within the existing JIS umbrella would keep juvenile courts' tools from further splintering. In addition to juvenile courts' use of JCS and JIS, the juvenile court portfolio currently includes local probation and several Assessments.com tools: Positive Achievement Change Tool (PACT), Risk Assessment - Juvenile Detention, and Risk Assessment - Misdemeanant Corrections. Considering, additionally, JCS functional integration with SCOMIS, a manageable architecture advises against incorporating additional independent packages. Further, development within JIS would leverage existing capabilities and infrastructure, and would align with ISD standards which prioritize (1) re-use and (2) re-factor, over (3) buy and (4) build.

Development within ASRA (Adult Static Risk Assessment) was determined to be a good fit for development within JIS. ASRA permits different security levels for different users. This feature is important, given that screening is generally undertaken by detention facilities rather than by juvenile court staff. Specifically, the JIS Link option allows granting of permissions for ASRA while barring JIS access; a security profile could be developed for Northern Oregon Corrections and for Martin Hall. A downside, however, is that JIS facilities would have to log into both applications.

Furthermore, ASRA's development queue would allow for quicker testing and implementation than would JCS subject, however, to availability of AOC's limited uniPaas resources. It is noted that ISD Operations' direction, aimed at achieving both savings and a more consolidated portfolio, is to retire both Cold Fusion and uniPaas. However, it will take at least a couple of years to transition, and the Operations Manager has determined that MAYSI-2 development would be a reasonable exception to the general strategy to hold the line on uniPaas development.

If this option is approved and initiated, the Center for Court Research has requested that, prior to deployment, testing of the application be done by representative users, as well as by someone from the National Youth Screening and Assessment Project (NYSAP), the developer of the MAYSI-2, and the validator of the MH-JDAT. Due to security and access considerations, whether - and the degree to which this request can be accommodated will need to be addressed during the project.

A final requirement is that printable electronic client-level reports (whether HTML, PDF, or other format) need to be discarded two weeks after generation. This is necessary to prevent storage issues.

Additional Systems Affected
Data Warehouse
Juvenile and Corrections System (JCS)
Communities Impacted
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
Juvenile Court Administrators
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
Endorsing Committee
   Washington Association of Juvenile Court Administrators
Endorser Name:
   Williams, Heather on behalf of WAJCA
Origination Date:
   03/13/2014
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
CLUG Superior Courts
Chair of Group Judge Dalton
Date of Decision 03/20/2014
Decision
Decision to Recommend for Approval Unamimously recommended to the approving authority
Priority Processing Status Prioritized
Ranking
Request Importance High
Scoring Detail Score / Possible
Business Value 10 / 10
Relative Priority 8 / 10
Cost 4 /  5
Complexity/Level of Effort 10 / 10
Risk 5 /  5
Benefit / Impact 5 /  5
Impact of Doing Nothing 4 /  5
Total Score 46 / 50
Implementation Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage Authorized
Prioritization Option: Non-Prioritized
Comments:

Authorized by Callie Dietz on April 14, 2014.

Implementation Detail
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage In Progress
Prioritization Option: Non-Prioritized
Comments:

Going forward with MAYSI-2. Will clarify if MH-JDAT still needs to be included.

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S5