Petitions for Review
The following are the results of the petitions for review considered by a department of the Supreme Court on November 3, 2015.
|
| No | Supreme Court Cause No |
Case Name |
1 |
91779-5 |
Jackson v. Quality Loan Serv. Corp. of Wash., et al. Denied |
2 |
91799-0 |
Husted, et al. v. State Denied |
3 |
91808-2 |
State v. Chambers Denied |
4 |
91809-1 |
State v. Eaglespeaker Denied |
5 |
91807-4 |
State v. Dunn Denied |
6 |
91811-2 |
State v. Johnson Denied |
7 |
91825-2 |
Birgen v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus. Denied |
8 |
91827-9 |
City of Lakewood v. Willis Granted |
9 |
91840-6 |
Riley-Hordyk v. Bethel School Dist. Denied |
10 |
91857-1 |
Stevenson v. Dep’t of Health & Nursing Care Quality Assurance Comm’n Denied |
11 |
91861-9 |
State v. K.L.G. Denied |
12 |
91865-1 |
Anderson v. Richard Anderson, et ux. Denied |
13 |
91873-2 |
State v. Campbell Denied |
14 |
91876-7 |
In re the Det. of Pettis Continued to December 3, 2015, En Banc Conference |
15 |
91878-3 |
ABC Holdings Inc., et al. v. Kittitas County Denied |
16 |
91880-5 |
Lamont v. Savio, et al. Denied |
17 |
91886-4 |
Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap County Denied |
18 |
91927-5 |
Peggy Mongomery and Dwight Mongomery, et ux. v. Glen Engelhard, et ux. Continued to December 3, 2015, En Banc Conference |
19 |
91934-8 |
State v. K.H.-H. Granted |
20 |
91935-6 |
State v. Burich Denied |
21 |
91943-7 |
State v. Elkins, Jr. Continued to December 3, 2015, En Banc Conference |
22 |
91952-6 |
State v. Peppin Denied |
23 |
91956-9 |
In re the Det. of Brooks Denied |
24 |
91998-4 |
Noll v. Special Electric Co., Inc. Deferred pending State v. LG Electronics #91391-9 |
25 |
91650-1 |
State v. Sagun Denied |
26 |
91789-2 |
Pelzel v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, et al. Deferred pending Brown v. Wash. State Dept. of Commerce #90652-1 |
27 |
91794-9 |
State v. Rodriguez Denied |
28 |
91822-8 |
State v. Hager Denied |
29 |
91835-0 |
State v. Torres Denied |
30 |
91931-3 |
State v. Larson Denied |
31 |
91936-4 |
State v. Reid Denied |
32 |
91946-1 |
State v. Benitez Denied |
33 |
91949-6 |
State v. Mohamed Denied |
MOTIONS
| No | Supreme Court Cause No |
Case Name |
| 16 | 91815-5 |
State v. McGovern
Grant motion for extension of time; deny petition for review |
Department Two
November 3, 2015Petitions for Review
Note: Granted petitions are shaded.
| No | Supreme Court Cause No |
Case Name |
1 |
91774-4 |
Pederson v. Emp’t Security Dep’t Denied |
2 |
91793-1 |
State v. Mendoza-Escatel Denied |
3 |
91795-7 |
State v. Kissler Denied |
4 |
91798-1 |
State v. Howerton Denied |
5 |
91806-6 |
State v. Marrufo-Sarinana Denied |
6 |
91810-4 |
In re the Marriage of Ashagari and Kassahun Denied |
7 |
91838-4 |
State v. Brousseau Denied |
8 |
91853-8 |
State v. Bird Denied |
9 |
91863-5 |
Total Outdoor Corp. v. City of Seattle Dep’t of Planning and Dev. Denied |
10 |
91867-8 |
The City of Burlington v. Hakam Singh, et ux., et al. Denied |
11 |
91871-6 |
The Doctors Co. v. Bennett, Bigelow & Leedom, P.S, et al. Denied |
12 |
91874-1 |
State v. Wolter Denied |
13 |
91928-3 |
Michael Uribe, et ux. v. Libey, Ensley & Nelson, PLLC, et al. Denied |
14 |
91929-1 |
In re the Guardianship of Decker Deny petition for review; grant Laufer’s attorney fee request |
15 |
91940-2 |
State v. Strange Denied |
16 |
91944-5 |
In re the Det. of Stout, Jr. Denied |
17 |
91950-0 |
In re the Det. of W.C.C. Grant petiton for review; grant motion to file reply in support of petition for review |
18 |
91954-2 |
State v. Licon Granted only on issue of discretionary LFO’s and remanded to the trial court for reconsideration consistent with State v. Blazina, 182 Wn.2d 827 (2015) |
19 |
91957-7 |
Renato Figuracion, et ux. v. Rembrandt Realty Trust, et al. Denied |
20 |
90160-1 |
State v. Manajares Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Tsai #88770-5 |
21 |
90320-4 |
State v. Quintero Cisneros Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Tsai #88770-5 |
22 |
91158-4 |
State v. Overmon Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Tsai #88770-5 |
23 |
91636-5 |
State v. Byrd Denied |
24 |
91759-1 |
Skrinnik v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus. Denied |
25 |
91783-3 |
State v. Magney Denied |
26 |
91805-8 |
State v. Pierre Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Love #89619-4 |
27 |
91814-7 |
State v. Anderson, Jr. Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Love #89619-4 |
28 |
91824-4 |
State v. Cox Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Love #89619-4 |
29 |
91826-1 |
State v. Olmsted Denied |
30 |
91834-1 |
State v. Singh Denied |
31 |
91930-5 |
State v. Skaar Denied |
32 |
91947-0 |
State v. Oates Denied |
33 |
92133-4 |
State v. Medina Grant joint motion for accelerated review; grant petition and remand to the trial court for resentencing in light of State v. Conover, 183 Wn.2d 706 (2015) |
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S5