9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
March 8, 2011
|
Case No. – 200,811-9 |
COUNSEL |
In re:
W. RUSSELL VAN CAMP,
Attorney at Law.
|
Dustin Deissner
Joanne Abelson (WSBA)
|
SYNOPSIS: The Court must decide whether procedural errors were made during Mr. Van Camp's disciplinary hearing, whether the WSBA proved Mr. Van Camp’s misconduct, and whether disbarment is the appropriate sanction. |
Case No. 2 – 84369-4 |
COUNSEL |
JACK FEIL and DELAPHINE FEIL, husband and wife; et al.
v.
THE EASTERN WASHINGTON GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, et al.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JACK FEIL and DELAPHINE FEIL, et al.
v.
DOUGLAS COUNTY, et al.
|
Robert Rowley/James Klauser
Marc Worthy/Stephen Klasinski/James Schwartz
Matthew Kernutt/Carol Wardell
Robert Rowley/James Klauser
Stephen Klasinski/James Schwartz/Matthew Kernutt
Carol Wardell
|
SYNOPSIS: Were development permits properly issued by Douglas County to the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission for construction of Rocky Reach Trail along the Columbia River in East Wenatchee? |
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 84003-2 |
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
ALBERTO PEREZ-VALDEZ
|
Joseph Golden/Teresa Chen
David Gasch |
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court abuse its discretion when it (1) refused to allow evidence about a victim’s prior bad act, (2) did not declare a mistrial on the basis of vouching testimony, and (3) did not allow the defense to argue general good moral character evidence that was admitted without objection? |
Case No. 4 – 84500-0 |
COUNSEL |
DAVID MOELLER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v.
FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, et al.
|
Stephen Hansen/Elizabeth Cabraser/Scott Nealey
Kenneth Masters/Shelby Frost Lemmell/Jill Bowman |
SYNOPSIS: The court considers whether, under an auto insurance policy, “repair” includes reimbursement to the insured for the diminution in value between the pre-accident car and the repaired car, and whether the trial court properly certified the case as a class action. |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
| 
