9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
March 15, 2011
|
THREE CASES ONLY – TWO IN A.M. – ONE IN P.M
Case No. 1 – 84855-6
|
COUNSEL |
CHAD M. CARLSEN and SHASTA CARLSEN,
husband and wife; et al.
v.
GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, an Oklahoma
limited liability company; et al.
|
Darrell Scott/Matthew Zuchetto & Timothy Durkop
Sally Gustafson Garratt/Gregory Jackson
Richard Epstein/Haas Hatic & Rebecca Bratter |
SYNOPSIS: The plaintiffs brought a class action lawsuit against Global Client Solutions and Rocky Mountain Bank & Trust in federal court, alleging that the two companies violated Washington’s Debt Adjusting Statute. The federal court asked the Washington State Supreme Court to consider four questions about Washington’s Debt Adjusting Statute. |
Case No. 2 – 84296-5
|
COUNSEL |
PHOENIX DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Washington Corporation, et al.
v.
CITY OF WOODINVILLE, a Washington Municipal Corporation, et al.
Petitioners.
|
George Hill/John Groen
Greg Rubstello/Philip Talmadge/J. Richard Aramburu
& Jeffrey Eustis
|
SYNOPSIS: The City of Woodinville denied two applications submitted by Phoenix Development, Inc. to rezone undeveloped property in northwest Woodinville. Should this court affirm or reverse the City’s decision, or remand it for modification or further proceedings? |
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 84197-7
|
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
JOSE MATILDE MORALES |
Sara Beigh
Eric Broman
|
SYNOPSIS: The defendant was convicted of vehicular assault. The Supreme Court must decide whether the defendant was informed of his right to an independent blood test. |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
