9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
May 10, 2011
|
Case No. 1 – 84240-0 |
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
JOHN CALDWELL GORDON
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
CHARLES ANDREW BUKOVSKY |
Kathleen Proctor
Kathryn Russell Selk
Kathleen Proctor
Eric Nielsen/David Koch |
SYNOPSIS: Gordon and Bukovsky were convicted of second degree murder and the jury found the presence of aggravating circumstances, which enhanced the defendants’ sentences. May they argue for the first time on appeal that the jury was not properly instructed on the aggravating circumstances? |
Case No. 2 – 84554-9 |
COUNSEL |
STATE OF WASHINGTON
v.
JAMES L. GRIFFIN |
Kraig Newman
Dana Lind |
SYNOPSIS: The court will decide whether the rules of evidence apply to testimony supporting an aggravated circumstance finding that exposes a defendant to an enhanced sentence above the standard sentencing range. |
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 84606-5 |
COUNSEL |
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of
ERNEST A. CARTER |
Melody Crick
Jeffrey Ellis |
SYNOPSIS: The Court of Appeals granted Carter’s untimely personal restraint petition and vacated his persistent offender sentence under the federal actual innocence doctrine. This court must decide whether the actual innocence doctrine applies in Washington, and if so, whether Carter has proven that he is actually innocent of being a persistent offender. |
Case No. 4 – 84475-5 |
COUNSEL |
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of
EDWARD MICHAEL GLASMANN |
Jeffrey Ellis
Thomas Roberts |
SYNOPSIS: Whether the prosecutor’s use of PowerPoint slides featuring defendant’s booking photo with the words “GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY” superimposed over his head deprived Glasmann of a fair trial? Whether defense counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the prosecutor’s closing remarks and PowerPoint slides? |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided only for the convenience of the public.
|
