Washington State Courts: Washington State Supreme Court Calendar
March 10, 1998
| 9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
Tuesday March 10, 1998 |
Case No. 1 -65105-1
|
COUNSEL
|
Barton P. Marzolf, Sr.,
v.
Snohomish County; et al,65218-0
Christine Hegel, et al
v.
Brett M. McMahon; et al. |
David Balint/Marco De Funis
Alfred Gehri/Tim Dore
Max Peabody
John Clark
Cheryl Adamson
|
| SYNOPSIS: Whether an action for negligent
infliction of emotional distress is available to an immediate relative of an accident
victim, when the relative did not witness the accident but arrived on the scene soon
thereafter. |
Case No. 2 -65294-5
|
COUNSEL
|
The Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis; Upper Skagit Indian
Tribe; Swinomish Indian Tribal Community; and Squaxin Island Tribe,
v.
James M. Johnson; State of Washington, Washington State Gambling Commission. |
Harold Chesnin
James Weber
Ronald Whitener/Kevin Lyon
James Johnson
Jonathan McCoy |
| SYNOPSIS: Whether records containing
financial information provided by Indian tribes to the Gambling Commission, pursuant to
tribal-state gaming compacts, are subject to disclosure under the Public Disclosure Act,
RCW 42.17. |
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 -65472-7
|
COUNSEL
|
Lois Hazel,
v.
Leonard Van Beek and Marjorie Van Beek. |
John Ludwigson
David Vis/Patrick Gallery
Philip Buri |
| SYNOPSIS: (1) Whether a court, in proceedings
to confirm a sheriff’s sale of property sold under execution, may consider objections
to the sale filed more than 20 days after the filing of the sheriff’s return of sale.
See RCW 6.21.110(2); and (2) Whether a stay issued in a judgment debtor’s bankruptcy
proceeding tolls the running of the 10-year life of a general judgment lien. |
Case No. 4 -65546-4
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Roland E. Riles,65734-3
State of Washington,
v.
Richard Lee Gholston |
Ann Foerschler/James Leslie/
Lisa O’Toole/Cynthia Gannett
Nielsen & Acosta
Roger Davidheiser
Kelly Curtin |
| SYNOPSIS: Whether the trial court imposed
improper monitoring and treatment conditions on Petitioners and unconstitutionally
prohibited them from contact with minors during their period of mandatory community
placement following their release from prison. |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the
convenience of the public only.
|
