June 29, 1999The results of Petitions for Review considered by a department of the Supreme Court are as follows:
Department OneJune 29, 1999
Petitions for Review:
State v. Pfaff
Stewart v. Chelan Cy.
J.R. Simplot, Inc. v. Knight
State v. Jerde
Sundquist Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish Cy. PUD 1
In re the Marriage of Mazzi
Duckworth v. Langland
State v. Kelekolio
Fife Properties v. Occupational Med. Clinic of Fife, Inc.
State v. Cuevas-Hernandez
Enterprise Leasing, Inc. v. Tacoma
State v. Kelley
State v. Jones
In re Truancy of Perkins;
Lindemann v. Falk
Kendall v. Reid
State v. Scherf
Weiland v. Gordon
State v. Erickson
State v. Smith
M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp.
State v. Williams
State v. Deel
In re Marriage of Johnson
Cockle v. Nelson
State v. Reiss
June 29, 1999
Petitions for Review:
Pitzer v. Union Bank of Calif.
State v. Lucas
State v. Williams
State v. Andress
Jones v. Sisters of Providence in Wa.
State v. Dahlquist
Smith v. Sea Ventures, Inc.
Badissy v. Chen Sun
State v. Fenn, et al.
State v. Traicoff
State v. Oliveros
State v. Carney
State v. Mikota
Costello v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
State v. Cliff
Washington Citizen Action v. Insurance Comm'r
In re Marriage of Wiener
Lybbert v. Grant Cy.
State v. Gustafson
Harbor Steps Limited Partnership v. Seattle Technical Finishing, Inc.
In re Marriage of Kergil
State v. Padvorac
State v. Bacolod
State, Dep't of Ecology v. Lundgren
Guntle v. Barnett
State v. Pastrana
State v. Horrace
State v. Ross
|
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S3