December 1, 1999The results of Petitions for Review considered by a department of the Supreme Court are as follows:
Department OneDecember 1, 1999
Petitions for Review:
State v. Kilcourse
State v. Carrizalez
Inniss v. Tandy Corp.
State v. Mills
Kim v. Pham
Sebastian v. Department of Labor & Indus.
Garneau v. Lauer
Ellwein v. Hartford Accident & Indemn. Co.
State v. Roush
State v. Carter
Diaz v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc.
Freedom Cy. Gov't v. Snohomish Cy.
State v. Grace
State v. Bradley
Johnston v. Seattle
State v. Dollinger
State v. Awiis
In re Estate of Ardell
Westminster Lane Rd. Ass'n v. Canning
Tunstead v. Bacon
Chang v. Egeland
State v. Hardie
State v. Townsend
State v. Stough
State v. Diefenbach
State v. Santos (a/k/a Marquette)
State v. Moak
State v. McMurtrey
State v. Ramseyer
Williams v. Turner
December 1, 1999
Petitions for Review:
Kelley v. Jacobs
Stewart v. Harris
State v. Morton
State v. Parra
Plum Creek Timber Co. v. Hillman
Ellis v. Seattle
State v. Hove
Nor Pac Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Tullis
State v. Pray
State v. Calvert
State v. Enault
State v. Putnam
State v. Briscoeray
Snohomish Cy. v. Postema
State v. Bradford
State v. Howard, et al.
Stella Sales, Inc. v. Johnson;
In re Marriage of Sowards
Dang v. Ehredt
State v. Aguilar
Seattle v. Williamson
Bates Oil Co. v. Bellevue;
Market Northwest, Inc. v. Grand Soft Equipment Co.
West v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.
In re Marriage of Harmon
State v. Frazier
State v. Chapman
In re Welfare of M.I.S., et al.
Cockle v. Department of Labor & Indus.
|
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S5