February 8, 2000The results of Petitions for Review considered by a department of the Supreme Court are as follows:
Department OneFebruary 8, 2000
Petitions for Review:
State v. Garcia
In re Marriage of Fuseki & Litman
Union Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. State, Dep't of Transp.
State v. Garcia
State v. Wendt;
Seattle First Nat'l Bank v. Grogan
Lecy v. Bayliner Marine Corp.;
Rich v. Fiberweb Washougal, Inc.
State v. Davis
State v. Desmarais
State v. Heringlake
Samis Land Co. v. City of Soap Lake
State v. Lopez
State v. Boyce
Germain v. Pullman Baptist Church;
State v. Monson
Santos v. Dean
Warren v. Department of Labor & Indus.
Steele v. Lundgren
State v. Peralta
In re Marriage of Geestman
State v. Day
State v. Finley
State v. Cashaw
Déjà Vu-Everett-Federal Way, Inc. v. City of Federal Way
State v. Gelenaw
State v. Hartz
State v. Pacheco
February 8, 2000
Petitions for Review:
In re Arbitration of Doyle v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.
State v. Horrace
State v. Hirschfield
State v. Azpitarte
State v. Leigh
In re Marriage of Metz
In re Marriage of Bennett
State v. McBrearty
State v. Gilmer
Spokane Cy. v. Bates
Bolden v. State, Dep't of Transp.
Campbell v. Reed;
State v. Alumbaugh
State v. Nason
Van Noy v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Grasso v. Pratt
Newton v. Legarsky
State v. Guerra
J.N. v. Bellingham Sch.
Neckas v. Holt
Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.
State v. Spates
Karst v. City of Seattle
Ellerman v. Centerpoint Prepress, Inc.
George v. Fowler
Burckhard v. Seabest Foods, Inc.
State v. Robinson
Tharp v. Stockinger
|
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S5