Petitions for Review
The following are the results of the petitions for review considered by a department of the Supreme Court on January 5, 2016.
|
| No | Supreme Court Cause No |
Case Name |
1 |
88818-3 |
State v. Wilson Denied |
2 |
90284-4 |
Alaska Structures, Inc. v. Hedlund Denied |
3 |
91960-7 |
Widrig v. The Villas at Meadow Springs, LLC Denied |
4 |
92025-7 |
State v. McKay-Erskine Denied |
5 |
92035-4 |
In re the Det. of Breedlove Denied |
6 |
92037-1 |
State v. Krona Denied |
7 |
92060-5 |
State v. Porter, Jr. Granted |
8 |
92062-1 |
State v. Scantling Continued to February 11, 2016, En Banc Conference |
9 |
92073-7 |
State v. Nelson Denied |
10 |
92076-1 |
State v. Ray Denied |
11 |
92083-4 |
State v. Thorson Denied |
12 |
92086-9 |
Palm v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus. Denied |
13 |
92088-5 |
State v. Scott Denied |
14 |
92099-1 |
State v. Harris Denied |
15 |
92100-8 |
State v. Wilhelm Denied |
16 |
92112-1 |
Hartstene Pointe Maint. Ass’n v. Diehl Denied |
17 |
92122-9 |
Kovacs v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus. Granted |
18 |
92129-6 |
State v. Aldridge Denied |
19 |
92134-2 |
State v. Talaga Denied |
20 |
92141-5 |
State v. Brown Denied |
21 |
92149-1 |
State v. Peneueta Denied |
22 |
92197-1 |
Larson v. City of Bellevue Continued to February 9, 2016, Department One calendar |
23 |
91984-4 |
State v. Kingma Denied |
24 |
92007-9 |
State v. Bryson Denied |
25 |
92030-3 |
State v. Ejonga Denied |
26 |
92079-6 |
State v. Lyle Continued to February 11, 2016, En Banc Conference |
27 |
92105-9 |
State v. Sorensen Denied |
28 |
92115-6 |
State v. Young Denied |
29 |
92132-6 |
State v. Watkins Continued to February 11, 2016, En Banc Conference |
30 |
92138-5 |
State v. Starrish Denied |
31 |
92144-0 |
State v. Navarro Denied |
MOTIONS
| No | Supreme Court Cause No |
Case Name |
| 1 | 92313-2 |
John Kalahar, et ux. v. ALCOA, Inc., et al. Deny motion for extension of time to file petition for review; grant unopposed motion to substitute parties |
| 2 | 92352-3 |
State v. Phillips Grant motion for extension of time to file petition for review; deny petition for review |
| 3 | 92277-2 |
McFarland v. BNSF Railway Co. Deny motion for extension of time to file petition for review |
Department Two
January 5, 2016Petitions for Review
Note: Granted petitions are shaded.
| No | Supreme Court Cause No |
Case Name |
1 |
92024-9 |
State v. Castillo-Murcia Denied |
2 |
92026-5 |
State v. Alexis Denied |
3 |
92028-1 |
Whittenburge v. Dep’t of Soc. & Health Servs. Denied |
4 |
92031-1 |
State v. Conner Denied |
5 |
92036-2 |
Mark Bressler, ex ux. v. Kevin Sullivan, et ux. Denied |
6 |
92057-5 |
State v. Cooley Continued to February 11, 2016, En Banc Conference |
7 |
92061-3 |
State v. Vargas Denied |
8 |
92074-5 |
State v. Hargrove Denied |
9 |
92077-0 |
State v. Delacruz and Hernandez Deny both petitions for review |
10 |
92080-0 |
Avnet, Inc. v. Dep’t of Revenue Granted |
11 |
92101-6 |
State v. Farrar-Breckenridge Denied |
12 |
92107-5 |
State v. Drahold Denied |
13 |
92110-5 |
State v. Thomas Denied |
14 |
92114-8 |
State v. Cooper Denied |
15 |
92117-2 |
In re the Marriage of Bent Deny petition for review; grant Respondent’s request for attorney fees |
16 |
92124-5 |
Thomas Barth, et ux. v. Am. Pension Servs., Inc. Deny petition for review; grant Respondent’s request for attorney fees |
17 |
92135-1 |
Bavand v. Chase Home Finance, et al. Denied |
18 |
92154-7 |
State v. Price Denied |
19 |
92161-0 |
Belenski v. Jefferson County Grant petition for review; grant Respondent’s motion to strike Petitioner’s reply to answer to petition for review |
20 |
92165-2 |
State v. Rodriguez Denied |
21 |
92072-9 |
State v. Jordan Denied |
22 |
92085-1 |
Seth Burrill Prod., Inc. v. Rebel Creek Tackle, Inc. Denied |
23 |
92087-7 |
Rahman v. Dep’t of Emp’t Sec. Denied |
24 |
92094-0 |
State v. Gyau Denied |
25 |
92096-6 |
State v. Gyau Denied |
26 |
92106-7 |
In re the Det. of P.K. Deferred pending In re the Detention of W.C.C. #91950-0 |
27 |
92131-8 |
State v. Wintermeier Continued to February 9, 2016, Department Two calendar |
28 |
92139-3 |
State v. Mitchell Deny petition for review; deny Petitioner’s motion for release pending appeal, or stay his sentence |
29 |
92148-2 |
State v. Lozano Denied |
30 |
92167-9 |
Cheng v. Spokane Eye Clinic, et al. Denied |
MOTIONS
| No | Supreme Court Cause No |
Case Name |
17 |
92268-3 |
Sak & Assoc. v. Ferguson Constr., Inc. Deny motion for extension of time to file petition for review |
18 |
92316-7 |
State v. Hudson Deny motion for extension of time to file petition for review |
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S5