Proposed Rules ArchivesGR 13 - Use of Unsworn Statement in Lieu of Affidavit
GR 9 COVER SHEET Suggested
Amendment to WASHINGTON
STATE COURT RULES: GR
13 Submitted
by the Submitted by the Board for Judicial Administration Legislative
Committee, the Superior Court Judges’ Association Legislative Committee, and
the District and Municipal Court Judges’ Association Legislative Committee _____________________________________________________________________ A. Name
of Proponent: Judge
Kevin Ringus, Chair, BJA Legislative Committee Judge
Jennifer Forbes, Co-Chair, SCJA Legislative Cmte Judge
Sean O’Donnell, Co-Chair, SCJA Legislative Cmte Judge
Paul Wohl, Chair, DMCJA Legislative Committee B. Spokesperson: J Benway, AOC Legal
Services C. Purpose: Recent legislation, Laws of 2019,
ch. 132, § 2, resulted in the repeal of RCW 9A.72.085, which is referenced
in GR 13 pertaining to the use of unsworn statements in lieu of affidavits. In
GR 13, RCW 9A.72.085 provides an authentication process so that an unsworn statement
can be treated as a sworn statement. In this way, the statute is similar to GR
30(d), enacted after GR 13, which also provides a method for signature
authentication. Because GR 30 provides a method of authentication, the
reference to RCW 9A.72.085 is no longer necessary and can be replaced with a
reference to GR 30. This approach will avoid further potential amendments due
to legislative changes and simplifies the amendment process. D. Proposed
Amendments: [see below] E. Hearing: A
hearing is not recommended due to the technical nature of the amendment. F. Expedited Consideration: Expedited
consideration is requested to minimize confusion in the court and legal
community. |
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S5