Proposed Rules ArchivesARLJ - Mandatory Continuing Court Administrator Education
GR 9 COVER SHEET Suggested
New WASHINGTON
STATE COURT RULE: ADMINISTRATIVE
RULES FOR COURTS OF LIMITED JURISDICTION RULE [14] MANDATORY CONTINUING
COURT ADMINISTRATOR EDUCATION ______________________________________________________________________________ A. Names
of Proponents: District & Municipal Court
Management Association (DMCMA) District
& Municipal Court Judges’ Association (DMCJA) B. Spokespersons: Margaret
Yetter, DMCMA Representative LaTricia Kinlow, DMCMA
Representative Judge
Michelle Gehlsen, President, DMCJA C. Purpose: The District and
Municipal Court Management Association (DMCMA) and District and Municipal Court
Judges’ Association (DMCJA) recommend adopting a new Administrative Rule for
the Courts of Limited Jurisdiction, which would mandate minimum education
requirements for court managers. The rule was written to parallel GR 26
regarding mandatory continuing education for judges, but to be specific to
courts of limited jurisdiction. Both associations have vetted the rule and
unanimously recommend adoption. Court managers are often responsible for ensuring court
compliance with the General Rules and other statutes and ordinances. Effective
and efficient management of courts requires knowledge and skills in
administrative roles and responsibilities, budgeting, human resource
management, and related topics. Mandatory training will help address overall
court management needs and ongoing education in order to more effectively serve
the public and community. The
Board of Judicial Administration (BJA) Court Education Committee Funding Task
Force conducted a survey in January 2018 and
found that: (1)
training opportunities are limited for court administrators;
(2)
court administrators were least likely to receive
training early in their tenure - 63% of new court administrators received no
training during their first six months on the job. (3)
court administrators should have mandatory training
requirements and more training opportunities. GR
26 established minimum requirements for continuing judicial education of judicial
officers. However, there is no rule that establishes minimum requirements for court
managers. The
DMCMA currently offers education and training to all court leaders. A rule
requiring mandatory education supports ongoing professional development of
court leadership and ensures court management efficiencies that are necessary
for those court leaders who are responsible for overseeing the advanced
functionality in courts of limited jurisdiction, and may enhance fair access to
resources. The DMCMA and the DMCJA worked together to craft the language of
this new rule, intended to fill this important gap in training for court
personnel. Please note the rule contains a proposed effective date of January
1, 2023, to allow time to provide education about and to prepare for
implementation of the new rule. D. Hearing: A hearing is
not recommended. E. Expedited Consideration: Expedited consideration is not requested. |
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S3