Proposed Rules ArchivesAPR - APR 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 28
Suggested Amendments ADMISSION AND PRACTICE RULES (APR)
Rules 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 11, & 28 Submitted by the Washington State Bar
Association
A.
Name of Proponent: Washington
State Bar Association Daniel D. Clark, President 1325
Fourth Avenue, Suite 600 Seattle,
WA 98101-2539 B. Spokesperson: Robert
W. Henry, Associate Director for Regulatory Services Washington State Bar
Association 1325
Fourth Avenue, Suite 600 Seattle,
WA 98101-2539 C.
Purpose: The
primary purpose of the suggested amendments to the Admission and Practice Rules
(APR) is to correct errors, clarify a rule, or update a rule to align with
modern processes. The APR underwent significant amendments in January 2014
based on recommendations from an APR Task Force, and subsequently were amended
significantly again in 2017 when LPOs and LLLTs were made members of the WSBA.
Since then, the COVID-19 pandemic, technological implementations, the advent of
certain legal education degrees, and simple oversights in previous amendments
have led to this effort to “clean-up” the APR. The suggested amendments were
presented at the September 2022 WSBA Board of Governors meeting, where the
Board of Governors voted unanimously to approve the amendments and submit them
to the Washington
Supreme Court. Only a few of the suggested amendments
have a substantive change and even most of those are primarily to clarify the
intent of the rule, incorporate current procedure, or reinstate a provision
previously provided for in a temporary order of the Washington Supreme Court.
The primary purposes of the suggested amendments with the most significant
modifications are described below. APR 2(a)(1) and (2): Allowing Judicial Members on the Board
of Bar Examiners and
Law Clerk Board. APR 2 grants the Board of Governors the
power to appoint a Board of Bar Examiners and a Law Clerk Board. Currently,
members of both boards must be active members of the WSBA. The suggested
amendments would allow judicial members of the WSBA to serve on these boards
also. Allowing judicial members to serve would increase the pool of potential
volunteers to assist with filling the need for volunteers on these boards. In
addition, it would be beneficial to have a judicial perspective on the Law
Clerk Board as judicial members may serve as tutors in the APR 6 law clerk
program. APR 3(b)(3): Clarifying a Law Degree Is Required for Common
Law Lawyer Qualification
for Bar Exam. APR 3(b) sets forth the various ways in
which a person can qualify for the lawyer bar examination1 in Washington. APR 3(b)(3) allows
lawyers from jurisdictions where the common law of England is the basis of its
jurisprudence to qualify for the bar exam if
1 There
are other avenues lawyers from foreign jurisdictions may pursue for admission
to practice law or licensure for the limited practice of law such as a house
counsel license. However, this suggested amendment specifically addresses the
qualifications for the bar examination and only for lawyers from common law
jurisdictions with practice experience. they have active legal experience for
at least three of the five years preceding the filing of the application. The
suggested amendment expressly adds a legal education requirement for these
lawyers, as is the case in all other means of qualifying for the bar exam in
Washington. See APR 3(b)(1), (2) and (4). It is also important to note that the
language in the suggested amendment specifies that it must be a law degree that
would qualify the applicant to practice law in the other jurisdiction. This
addresses the fact that many law degrees in foreign jurisdictions are not the
JD and in some cases may not be a graduate degree. The suggested amendment is intended to
be a clarification rather than a substantive change. The rule, when adopted,
presumed the person applying for the bar exam from a common law jurisdiction
would also have a law degree qualifying them to be admitted to practice law. In
fact, this provision was included in the APR for the first time in September
1992 after someone petitioned the Board of Governors for an exception based on
their graduation from a law school in England and their admission and practice
experience in both England and California. See Supplemental Materials No. 1.
This suggested amendment merely clarifies the original intent of this rule
which is a law degree is required to qualify for the bar exam under this
provision of APR 3(b). APR 9(b)(4) & (5): Permitting Law Clerks Who Recently
Completed the Law Clerk
Program and Recent LLM Graduates Who Qualify for the Bar Exam to Be Licensed
Legal Interns. Currently, law
students who have completed 2/3 of their law school education, APR 6 law clerks
who have completed 5/8 of their law clerk program, and recent law school
graduates can be licensed legal interns under APR 9. In a temporary order issued as a result of the pandemic, the
Washington Supreme Court also allowed law clerks who recently completed the law
clerk program and those LLM graduates who qualify for the bar exam under APR
3(b)(4) to be licensed legal interns. See Supplemental Materials No. 2. The
temporary order has since expired. The suggested amendments would reinstate
those provisions of the order that expired and allow the following to apply for
a APR 9 licensed legal intern license: ·
Law clerks who completed the APR 6 law clerk program as long
as the intern application is submitted within nine months of completing the
program; and ·
LLM graduates who qualify for the bar exam under APR 3(b)(4)
as long as the intern application
is filed within nine months of graduation. Including these individuals who qualify
to apply for the bar exam applies the same standard as is applied to J.D. graduates
of law school who are permitted to apply under Rule 9 within nine months of
graduation. This will allow these candidates for admission opportunities to
gain valuable practical experience while preparing for the bar exam and
awaiting bar exam results. APR 9(d)(8): Misconduct and Action Against Rule 9 License. The suggested amendments to this
provision of APR 9 relate to misconduct by a licensed legal intern. The
suggested amendments clarify and broaden the conduct that could, but would not
necessarily, result in the WSBA taking action against
the Rule 9 license. Importantly, it removes the language about forfeiture of
the privilege to take the bar exam, as that privilege can only be denied by the
Court following a character and fitness hearing under APR 20-24.3. Suggested
Amendments to Correct, Clarify, or Modernize Rules The purposes of the remaining and vast
majority of the suggested amendments are
to: ·
correct errors and omissions in previous submissions of
suggested amendments; ·
clarify certain aspects of rules that cause confusion for
either members, applicants, or
staff. For example, with the advent of new law degrees such as Executive Juris
Doctor (EJD), there is now a need to clarify the law degree referred to in APR
9 is the Juris Doctor (JD); and ·
modernize administrative processes to align with
technological advances and implementation of online procedures. For example,
applications are submitted online and documents are “delivered” to applicants
and others electronically instead of via U.S.
mail. All
suggested amendments in this category are identified in the following table:
D.
Hearing: A hearing is not requested. E.
Expedited Consideration: Expedited
consideration is not requested. F.
Supporting Material: 1. GR 9 Coversheet re 1991 Amendment to APR 3(b) and Related
Documents [NOTE: This document could not be reproduced by Rules Committee Staff
and is available upon request.] 2.
Order Temporarily Modifying APR, Dated
May 15, 2020 FILED SUPREME COURT
STATE
OF WASHINGTON MAY 15, 2020 BY
SUSAN L. CARLSON CLERK THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitates special measures to allow for the safe administration of the bar exam and may affect the ability of some applicants to take the Bar exam in July, and WHEREAS, Washington’s Admission and Practice Rule (APR) 9 permits eligible law school and law clerk students and graduates to engage in limited and supervised legal practice within the delineated scope of their APR 9 licenses, and WHEREAS, the Court recognizes the benefit to members of the public who need legal services of continuing to authorize educated and trained APR 9 Licensed Legal Interns to provide assistance to clients, within the scope of their APR 9 licenses and supervision, and WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed Washington’s APRs to consider whether any of its provisions should be modified in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, The Court hereby unanimously enters the following order establishing temporary modifications to some provisions of the current APRs: 1)
APR 4(d)(1) is temporarily modified for the bar exams
to be administered in Washington in July and September 2020 only, to allow for
a minimum passing score of 266; Page 2 ORDER TEMPORARILY MODIFYING ADMISSION AND PRACTICE RULES No. 25700-B-623 2)
Notwithstanding any provision of APR 3, the court
authorizes the WSBA to modify exam procedures to the extent necessary for the
safe and effective administration of the bar exam in July and September 2020. 3)
The provisions of APR 9(h) regarding the term of the
license are modified so that no APR 9 license will be subject to termination
solely because the APR 9 Licensed Legal Intern has been licensed for more than
30 consecutive months or for more than 18 months after graduation from an
approved law school or completion of the APR 6 Law Clerk program; 4)
The provisions of APR 9(f)(6) regarding the limits on
the number of Licensed Legal Interns
that one Active lawyer may supervise at one time are modified so that: an
Active lawyer in private practice may supervise up to three APR Licensed Legal
Interns at one time; and an Active lawyer employed by a recognized institution
of legal aid, legal assistance, public defense or similar programs furnishing
legal assistance to indigents, or by the legal department of a state, county or
municipality may supervise up to six APR 9 Licensed Legal Interns at one time; and 5)
The provisions of APR 9(b)(3) are modified to clarify
that the term “graduate of an approved law school” includes all applicants with
the educational requirements to qualify to sit for the lawyer bar examination,
as established in APR 3(b)(1), (2), and
(4). The temporary modifications stated above will remain in effect until December 31, 2021, or until further order of the Court. In recognition of the economic realities facing recent law school graduates, the Court takes this opportunity to express its support for efforts to ensure that any Licensed Legal Intern Page 3 ORDER TEMPORARILY MODIFYING ADMISSION AND PRACTICE RULES No. 25700-B-623 who is covered by the eligibility provisions of APR 9(b)(3) shall receive monetary compensation in compliance with federal and state law governing employment or monetary compensation provided through grants or other funding sources. DATED at Olympia, Washington this 15th day of May, 2020. For the Court
|
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S3