GENERAL RULE 9

RULE AMENDMENT COVER SHEET SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO JuCR 11.XX

1.       Proponent Organization: BJA Remote Proceedings Work Group

2.       Spokesperson & Contact Info:

Judge Jim Rogers, Co-Chair BJA Remote Proceedings Work Group – Superior Court Level Email: Jim.Rogers@kingcounty.gov

Phone: 206-477-1597

3.       Purpose of Suggested Rule Amendment

This proposed new rule allows individuals to appear by remote technology with additional safeguards that are consistent with existing CrR 3.4(e). The Group supports this new rule.

In some jurisdictions, dependency matters can frequently be held partially in person and partially by remote technology. In some jurisdictions, it is a matter of access to justice, as some counsel (in rural areas) and some parents have difficulty appearing in person. The Group agreed that it was appropriate to give courts control over who appears in person and who appears remotely.

4.       Is Expedited Consideration Requested?

Expedited consideration is essential. The Supreme Court Emergency Order will be lifted soon and some form of amended or new rules addressing remote proceedings should be passed before the Order is lifted

5.       Is a Public Hearing Recommended? No