Proposed Rules ArchivesELC 2.14 - Restrictions On Representing Or Advising Respondents Or Grievants
Suggested
Amendments to
RULES FOR ENFORCEMENT OF LAWYER CONDUCT (ELC) Rule 2.14(d) A.
Proponent: Disciplinary Advisory Round Table B.
Spokespersons: Anne Seidel,
member, Disciplinary Advisory Round Table, anne@anneseidel.com, (206)
284- 2282 Darlene Neumann, Staff Liaison,
Disciplinary Advisory Round Table, Washington State Bar Association, darlenen@wsba.org, (206) 733-5923 C. Purpose:
The suggested amendment adds an exception to ELC 2.14(d) to allow a former
member of the Board of Governor to represent individuals in pending
disciplinary proceedings or grievances after leaving office under certain criteria. ELC 2.14 restricts current Board of Governor members, Association officers, the Executive Director, Disciplinary Board members, and hearing officers from advising or representing individuals in pending or likely disciplinary grievances or proceedings while serving in that capacity. After leaving office, the former officeholders are further prohibited from representing individuals in pending disciplinary grievances or proceedings for three years. ELC 2.14(b). The rule provides an exception for former officeholders to serve as appointed disability counsel. ELC 2.14(d). Under the amendment, a former Board of Governor member would not be subject to the three- year prohibition on representing individuals after leaving office if: 1) the former BOG member represented at least 10 respondents in disciplinary proceedings or grievances before taking office, and 2) the former Board of Governors member is prohibited from involvement with decisions or actions of the Board related to functions under the ELC for three years after BOG service ends. BOG members who routinely represent respondents in disciplinary matters may be disincentivized from serving on the Board of Governors because doing so would prevent them from providing services in their area of practice during their three years of service on the Board and for three years after departing office. In the event an experienced respondents counsel does choose to serve, the rule has an unnecessarily severe impact on the pool of available lawyers who do such work in Washington State. The rule serves important purposes related to the integrity of the discipline system, such as minimizing the risk of influence peddling and cronyism. But those purposes are less weighty when a lawyer joins the Board of Governors with meaningful prior experience serving as counsel in the discipline system. In such cases, it is unlikely that the lawyer is seeking office in order to gain undeserved credibility as a lawyer in discipline matters and then peddle that influence after leaving office. For this reason, the suggested amendment applies only to former BOG members with substantial experience representing respondents prior to being elected. Furthermore, the risk of cronyism is addressed because such lawyers would be prohibited from lobbying the BOG on issues related to disciplinary functions for three years after leaving office to minimize the potential for exertion of undue influence on former Board-member colleagues. D.
Hearing: A hearing is not requested. E.
Expedited Consideration: Expedited consideration is not requested. F.
Supporting Material: a.
ELC
2.14(d) Redline b.
ELC
2.14(d) Clean
|
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S3