1345 - Integration of OCourt platform into the new CLJ-CMS

 
Request Status Summary
Request Status Authorized
Status Comment
Request Detail
Requestor Name:
   Woodrow, Bonnie B
Origination Date:
   07/14/2022
    
Recommended Endorser:
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Request Type: New System
Which Systems are affected? Judicial Information System (JIS)
Other
Business Area: Other
Communities Impacted: AOC
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
State Agencies
Impact if not Resolved: High
Impact Description:

Integration with a document library system and the ability to keep an all-digital court process is essential to court operations. We are neither prepared nor able to surrender our all-digital courtroom. Furthermore, it is not simply a matter losing technology enhancements and functionality. Each of our jurisdictions has made a significant investment in time and money in creating an all-digital process. Our local governments have not anticipated the loss of these programs and are not prepared to cover the costs associated to returning to a traditional, paper driven courtroom once we convert to the new CLJ CMS program.

What is the Business Problem or Opportunity

We are requesting the following:

  1. Integration of OCourt product or similar program functionality with Enterprise Justice via the integration platform and,
  2. The integration platform be developed simultaneously with the CLJ CMS project.

The OCourt program was designed in 2013 in partnership with CodeSmart, Inc. (now Omiga Solutions) to develop a master calendaring system and electronic document library system that integrates with JIS.

OCourt allows remote signature capture and works in conjunction with the city's digital document storage system to create an all-digital court process. The OCourt e-forms are interactive with JIS, collapsible and the crowning achievement of the program. To date, OCourt has 67 electronic forms, most of which mirror the Washington state Pattern Forms. These functionalities and efficiencies are not available in the new CLJ CMS, Enterprise Justice. Currently 40 jurisdictions operate using OCourt.

In order to avoid losing our current functionality and the technology enhancements developed to eliminate stopgaps in the current JIS program, the courts using the OCourt program are requesting to have the integration developed in conjunction with the new CLJ CMS program.

The coronavirus pandemic has shown the importance of providing on-demand access to digital documents, the ability to capture electronic signatures, and the functionality of emailing court documents and orders to all court participants. OCourt has been a key component in providing these services to the communities we serve.

Despite its devastating impact to our local and global communities, the lessons learned from the coronavirus pandemic have dramatically increased access to justice, while reducing failures to appear. Because products, such as OCourt, are accessible on most smart devices individuals have gained greater accessibility to our courts.

Expected Benefit:

Expected Benefit:

See attached letter from the OCourt judges and administrators recently sent to AOC for additional background, details, and benefits.

Any Additional Information:

See attachments

Endorsement Detail
Endorsing Committee
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Endorser Name:
   Escudero, Arsenio on behalf of Uneek Maylor- DMCJA
Origination Date:
   07/25/2022
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
AOC Analysis Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date: 08/12/2022
Request Rationale
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: Yes
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: Yes
Breadth of Solution Benefit: Wide
Cost Estimates
Cost Benefit Analysis Complete? No
Cost to Implement? $490,000
Positive Return on Investment? No
Projected Maintenance cost? TBD
Feasibility Study needed? No
Court Level User Group
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction
Approving Authority CIO
Request Summary:

This request is to enable the data exchange between the OCourts platform and the new managed CLJ-CMS.

The CLJ-CMS Project Steering Committee raised a concern regarding possible unmet capabilities by the Tyler suite of applications and the loss of specific business capabilities and efficiencies currently provided by locally implemented applications such as virtual/remote courts, real-time forms management and signatures, scheduling hearings by clients, financial collections, and access by various devices (smart phones, tablets, etc.). If these local capabilities are unmet by the Tyler applications, the courts will lose efficiencies that may result in manual workarounds and the need for additional staff resources.

Currently, 40 jurisdictions operate using one or more modules of the OCourts suite. OCourts has 67 electronic forms, most of which mirror the state's Pattern Forms. In order to avoid losing current functionality and the technology enhancements developed to eliminate stopgaps in the current JIS program, the courts using the OCourts program are requesting to integrate with the new Enterprise Integration Platform and External AOC API.

Business Impacts:

This change will address the functional gaps between the local applications and Enterprise Justice (Odyssey).

Summary of Proposed Solution

OCourts will connect to the External AOC API to exchange information with the managed CMS solution.

Proposed Solution

The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) would provide technical and business support to help local jurisdictions and their vendors to onboard locally implemented court applications to the new External AOC API system that taps into the Enterprise Justice-based CLJ-CMS system.

Note: This proposed solution analysis only covers the work at AOC and does not encompass the work or costs required by the third-party software vendor or the court staff. It will be up to the local courts to fund the third-party vendor's work to connect to the External AOC API and Enterprise Integration Platform.

Additional Systems Affected
Other
Communities Impacted
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Public and Other Users
AOC Analysis Detail
Analysis Date: 08/23/2022
Request Rationale
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: Yes
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: Yes
Breadth of Solution Benefit: Wide
Cost Estimates
Cost Benefit Analysis Complete? No
Cost to Implement? $490,000
Positive Return on Investment? No
Feasibility Study needed? No
Court Level User Group
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction
Approving Authority CIO
Request Summary:

This request is to enable the data exchange between the OCourts platform and the new managed CLJ-CMS.

The CLJ-CMS Project Steering Committee raised a concern regarding possible unmet capabilities by the Tyler suite of applications and the loss of specific business capabilities and efficiencies currently provided by locally implemented applications such as virtual/remote courts, real-time forms management and signatures, scheduling hearings by clients, financial collections, and access by various devices (smart phones, tablets, etc.). If these local capabilities are unmet by the Tyler applications, the courts will lose efficiencies that may result in manual workarounds and the need for additional staff resources.

Currently, 40 jurisdictions operate using one or more modules of the OCourts suite. OCourts has 67 electronic forms, most of which mirror the state's Pattern Forms. In order to avoid losing current functionality and the technology enhancements developed to eliminate stopgaps in the current JIS program, the courts using the OCourts program are requesting to integrate with the new Enterprise Integration Platform and External AOC API.

Business Impacts:

This change will address the functional gaps between the local applications and Enterprise Justice (Odyssey).

Summary of Proposed Solution

The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) would provide technical and business support to help local jurisdictions and their vendors to onboard locally implemented court applications to the new External AOC API system that taps into the Enterprise Justice-based CLJ-CMS system.

Note: This proposed solution analysis only covers the work at AOC and does not encompass the work or costs required by the third-party software vendor or the court staff. It will be up to the local courts to fund the third-party vendor's work to connect to the External AOC API and Enterprise Integration Platform.

Proposed Solution

OCourts will connect to the External AOC API to exchange information with the managed CMS solution.

Additional Systems Affected
Other
Communities Impacted
AOC
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
Endorsing Committee
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Endorser Name:
   Escudero, Arsenio on behalf of Uneek Maylor- DMCMA
Origination Date:
   08/23/2022
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
CLUG Courts of Limited Jurisdiction
Chair of Group Suzanne Elsner
Date of Decision 08/29/2022
Decision
Decision to Recommend for Approval Unamimously recommended to the approving authority
Priority Processing Status Prioritized
Scoring Detail
In making their decision, detailed score values were not provided by Courts of Limited Jurisdiction.
Pros & Cons (if vote is not unanimous)

NA

Additional Notes

CLJ CLUG Priority #3 : ITG 256- Spokane Municipal Court CMS to EDR Data Exchange has been replaced with ITG 1345. ITG 256 is now priority #5. ITG 1345 is now Priority #3.

Implementation Detail
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage Authorized
Prioritization Option: Prioritized
Comments:

This request was authorized by Vonnie Diseth on September 8, 2022.

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S3