|
1353 - Build New Supreme Court Case Document Web Page
|
|
Request Status Summary |
Request Status |
Authorized |
|
Request Detail |
Requestor Name: |
|
Anglin, Laura |
Origination Date: |
|
09/30/2022 |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
|
Appellate Courts Endorsing Group |
|
Request Type: |
Change or Enhancement
|
Which Systems are affected? |
Other
|
Other affected Systems / Business Processes |
Public Facing Website (www.courts.wa.gov) |
Business Area: |
Other
|
Communities Impacted: |
AOC
Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Supreme Court Judicial Asst.
Appellate Court Judges
Appellate Court Clerks
Public and Other Users
|
Impact if not Resolved: |
Medium |
|
|
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
The Supreme Court would like to have a new website built so that their customers (public, justice partners, law students, attorneys, media, etc.) has an easy way to find and view Supreme Court case related documents (opinions, briefs, etc.) and resources (oral argument recording on TVW for example) in one place. Today, those customers are required to go to different locations on the www.courts.wa.gov website in order to find case documents and resources. For example, if they want to look for an Opinion, they must navigate to https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/ and then search for an Opinion in order to view. If the customer wants to view a brief, they must navigate to https://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/coaBriefs/index.cfm?fa=coaBriefs.ScHome&courtId=A08 and search for a brief in order to view.
|
Expected Benefit: |
Supreme Court customers will be able to go to the new page, enter a Supreme Court case number and the page will then display the documents and resources available to them in one location. This will make it easier for the customers as it will save them time to find case documents and resources and will not require them to look around for case documents and resources. It will also decrease the calls for assistance to the Supreme Court and/or AOC when customer are having difficulty locating case documents and resources.
Court staff will also benefit as they will have the ability to easily access the case documents and resources without having to use OnBase and VPN to look for these documents and resources.
|
Any Additional Information: |
This is a request from Laura Anglin on behalf of the Supreme Court Chief Justice.
|
Endorsement Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
Appellate Courts Endorsing Group |
Endorser Name: |
|
Ammons, Kevin on behalf of the Appellate Courts Endorsing Group |
Origination Date: |
|
10/31/2022 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
This request is endorsed. The group specifically requests that the analysis of this request also include the same functionality for the Court of Appeals, either as a seperate cost, or included in the primary analysis.
|
|
|
AOC Analysis Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
05/17/2023
|
Request Rationale |
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Wide |
Cost Estimates |
Cost Benefit Analysis Complete? |
No |
Cost to Implement? |
$100,000 |
Positive Return on Investment? |
No |
Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
Court Level User Group |
Appellate Courts |
Approving Authority |
CIO |
|
Request Summary: |
The Supreme Court needs a new website built so that their customers (public, justice partners, law students, attorneys, media, etc.) have an easy one-stop site to view Supreme Court case related documents and resources such as oral argument recordings from TVW. Currently, customers are required to go to different locations on the www.courts.wa.gov website in order to find case documents and resources. It can be difficult to locate items such as Briefs and Opinions from the same case. This can be challenging for many users.
|
Business Impacts: |
Supreme Court customers will be able to go to the new page, enter a Supreme Court case number, and the page will then display the documents and resources available to them in one location. This will create an efficient way for customers to search for these items. It will also decrease the calls for assistance to the Supreme Court and/or AOC when customers are having difficulty locating case documents and resources.
Court staff will also benefit as they will have the ability to easily access case documents and resources without having to use OnBase or needing to log into the AOC's Virtual Private Network (VPN).
|
Summary of Proposed Solution |
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) will design a new portal site, which centralizes all publications and related web applications for the Supreme Court.
|
Proposed Solution |
The AOC's Office of Communications and the web team will design a new portal site, which centralizes all publications and related web applications for the Supreme Court. This will create an easy, one-stop site for users to locate all documents and resources related to a case.
Assumptions:
The web team will review all impacted publication processes and web applications such as:
- Advance Filing Notification application
- Opinions
- Public main page
- Opinion maintenance web application
- Subscription and notification process
- Oral Arguments, Briefs, Petitions for Review, Calendars
- Related Case participants and related events
- Oral Arguments
- Integrating with TVW for specific events and video presentations
|
Additional Systems Affected |
Other
|
Communities Impacted |
AOC
Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Supreme Court Judicial Asst.
Appellate Court Judges
Appellate Court Clerks
Public and Other Users
|
|
|
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
Appellate Courts Endorsing Group |
Endorser Name: |
|
Escudero, Arsenio |
Origination Date: |
|
06/06/2023 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
|
|
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
|
CLUG |
Appellate Courts |
Chair of Group |
Appellate Court Group |
Date of Decision |
06/09/2023 |
Decision |
Decision to Recommend for Approval |
Unamimously recommended to the approving authority |
Priority Processing Status |
Prioritized |
|
Scoring Detail |
In making their decision, detailed score values were not provided by Appellate Courts.
|
|
Pros & Cons (if vote is not unanimous) |
N/A
|
Additional Notes |
Prioritized as #6. Will need to be authorized by the CIO.
|
|
Implementation Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
|
Implementation Stage
|
Authorized
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Prioritized
|
|
Comments:
|
Prioritized as #6 by Appellate Court Group.
|
|
|
|
|