| |
1374 - MANDATE - Implement Hope Card Program
|
|
| Request Status Summary |
| Request Status |
In Progress |
|
| Request Detail |
| Requestor Name: |
| |
Ammons, Kevin |
| Origination Date: |
| |
03/13/2024 |
| |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
| |
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
|
| Original Title: |
Implement Hope Card Program |
| Request Type: |
Mandated Change
Mandated Change
|
| Mandated Change |
HB 1766 |
| Which Systems are affected? |
Other
|
| Other affected Systems / Business Processes |
Courts.wa.gov |
| Business Area: |
Orders
|
| Communities Impacted: |
AOC
Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Supreme Court Judicial Asst.
Appellate Court Judges
Appellate Court Clerks
Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
Superior Court Administrators
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
Juvenile Court Administrators
State Agencies
Public and Other Users
|
| Impact if not Resolved: |
High |
| Impact Description: |
|
Courts could not easily comply with HB 1766 if this work is not completed.
|
|
|
| What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
|
This request is to support the establishment of a Hope Card Program in Washington based upon HB 1766. This would include the business program in the Court Services Division of AOC and Some technology applications provided by the Information Services Division,
|
| Expected Benefit: |
|
Allow individuals who have protection orders issued by Washington courts to receive a Hope Card confirming that a protection order has been issued and basic data about the order.
|
| Any Additional Information: |
|
While this request is for legislation that has passed, succesful implementation may require additional legislative changes.
|
| Endorsement Detail
|
| Endorsing Committee |
| |
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
| Endorser Name: |
| |
Ammons, Kevin |
| Origination Date: |
| |
03/22/2024 |
|
| Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
| Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
|
After presentation of a proposed concept of operations to the AOC Executive Team, this mandated request is proceeding to coordination with the stakeholder groups identified in HB1766. The team is focusing on crafting an achievable outcome for the January 1, 2025 implementation date.
|
|
|
| AOC Analysis Detail
|
| Analysis Date: |
03/22/2024
|
| Request Rationale |
| Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
| Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
| Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Wide |
| Cost Estimates |
| Cost Benefit Analysis Complete? |
No |
| Cost to Implement? |
TBD |
| Positive Return on Investment? |
No |
| Projected Maintenance cost? |
TBD |
| Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
| Court Level User Group |
| Non-JIS |
| Approving Authority |
CIO |
|
| Request Summary: |
This request is to support the establishment of a Hope Card Program in Washington based upon HB 1766. This would include the business program in the Court Services Division of AOC and Some technology applications provided by the Information Services Division,
|
| Business Impacts: |
A solution will be implemented to all Hope Cards to be issued.
|
| Summary of Proposed Solution |
AOC will coordinate with the major stakeholders and implement a solution to allow the issuance of Hope Cards.
|
| Proposed Solution |
AOC will coordinate with the major stakeholders and implement a solution to allow the issuance of Hope Cards.
|
| Additional Systems Affected |
Other
|
| Communities Impacted |
AOC
Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
CLJ Judges
CLJ Managers
Family and Juvenile Law Judges
Public and Other Users
|
|
|
| Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
| Endorsing Committee |
| |
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
| Endorser Name: |
| |
Ammons, Kevin |
| Origination Date: |
| |
03/22/2024 |
|
| Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
|
|
| Court Level User Group Decision Detail
|
| CLUG |
Non-JIS |
| Chair of Group |
Mandated by HB1766 |
| Date of Decision |
03/22/2024 |
| Decision |
| Decision to Recommend for Approval |
Unamimously recommended to the approving authority |
| Priority Processing Status |
Prioritized |
|
| Scoring Detail |
|
In making their decision, detailed score values were not provided by Non-JIS.
|
|
| Pros & Cons (if vote is not unanimous) |
N/A
|
| Additional Notes |
N/A
|
|
| Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
|
Implementation Stage
|
Authorized
|
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Prioritized
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Mandated by legislation.
|
|
|
| Implementation Detail
|
| Analysis Date: |
|
|
Implementation Stage
|
In Progress
|
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Prioritized
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
Work has begun focusing on stakeholder coordination.
|
|
|
|
|
