|
1402 - OnBase Product Upgrade to v25.1
|
|
Request Status Summary |
Request Status |
In Progress |
|
Request Detail |
Requestor Name: |
|
Sunchu, Rama |
Origination Date: |
|
07/25/2025 |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
|
Request Type: |
Change or Enhancement
|
Which Systems are affected? |
Other
|
Other affected Systems / Business Processes |
Appellate Court Document Management System (OnBase) |
Business Area: |
Other
|
Communities Impacted: |
AOC
Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Supreme Court Judicial Asst.
Appellate Court Judges
Appellate Court Clerks
Public and Other Users
|
Impact if not Resolved: |
High |
Impact Description: |
If we do not upgrade, we risk falling out of Hyland's active support window, which can limit our access to critical security patches, bug fixes, and technical assistance. Over time, this may lead to increased system vulnerabilities, compatibility issues with other enterprise applications, and higher maintenance costs.
Additionally, we will miss out on key productivity and usability improvements introduced in newer versions, such as responsive forms, enhanced workflow tools, and modern integration options. This could hinder our ability to support evolving business needs, reduce user satisfaction, and delay adoption of future-ready technologies like AI-driven content intelligence.
|
|
|
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
We are currently running OnBase 22.1, while Hyland's most recent Long-Term Release (LTR) is 25.1. Upgrading ensures we stay aligned with Hyland's recommended support lifecycle and positions us to take advantage of the latest enhancements in security, performance, and user experience.
|
Expected Benefit: |
OnBase 25.1 introduces a modernized web interface, responsive Unity Forms, improved workflow tools, and expanded integration capabilities with platforms like Microsoft 365. It also lays the groundwork for future AI-powered features. This upgrade will improve user efficiency, reduce administrative overhead, and ensure our platform remains well-supported and scalable.
|
Endorsement Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
Endorser Name: |
|
Escudero, Arsenio on behalf of AOC Endorsement Group |
Origination Date: |
|
07/25/2025 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
Mandated ITG
|
|
|
AOC Analysis Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
07/25/2025
|
Request Rationale |
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Narrow |
Cost Estimates |
Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
Court Level User Group |
Non-JIS |
Approving Authority |
CIO |
|
Request Summary: |
Upgrade to OnBase 25.1
|
Business Impacts: |
OnBase 25.1 introduces a modernized web interface, responsive Unity Forms, improved workflow tools, and expanded integration capabilities with platforms like Microsoft 365. It also lays the groundwork for future AI-powered features. This upgrade will improve user efficiency, reduce administrative overhead, and ensure our platform remains well-supported and scalable.
|
Summary of Proposed Solution |
Update to OnBase 25.1
|
Proposed Solution |
Update to OnBase 25.1 to improve user efficiency, reduce administrative overhead, and ensure our platform remains well-supported and scalable.
|
Additional Systems Affected |
Other
|
Communities Impacted |
AOC
Supreme Court Justices
Supreme Court Clerks
Supreme Court Judicial Asst.
Appellate Court Judges
Appellate Court Clerks
Public and Other Users
|
|
|
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
Endorser Name: |
|
Escudero, Arsenio on behalf of AOC Endorsement Group |
Origination Date: |
|
07/25/2025 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
Mandated ITG
|
|
|
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
|
CLUG |
Non-JIS |
Chair of Group |
Arsenio Escudero on behalf of Non-JIS CLUG |
Date of Decision |
07/25/2025 |
Decision |
Decision to Recommend for Approval |
Unamimously recommended to the approving authority |
Priority Processing Status |
Prioritized |
|
Scoring Detail |
In making their decision, detailed score values were not provided by Non-JIS.
|
|
Pros & Cons (if vote is not unanimous) |
NA
|
Additional Notes |
Mandated ITG
|
|
Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
Analysis Date: |
|
Implementation Stage
|
Authorized
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Prioritized
|
|
|
|
Implementation Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
|
Implementation Stage
|
In Progress
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Prioritized
|
|
|
|
|
|