19 - Display Judgements (SCOMIS Case Type 9) as Part of the Original Case

 
Request Status Summary
Request Status Completed
Status Comment This enhancement implemented on March 18th, 2011.
Request Detail
Requestor Name:
   Alfasso, Lynne
Origination Date:
   08/19/2010
    
Recommended Endorser:
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Request Type: Change or Enhancement
Which Systems are affected? Data Warehouse
Case and Criminal History (CACH)
Business Area: Other
Communities Impacted: Public and Other Users
Impact if not Resolved: Medium
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity

This request is for the http://dw.courts.wa.gov/ website to display judgments entered in civil and criminal cases (SCOMIS Case type 9) as a hyperlink in the underlying case for which the judgment was issued. When a search is performed on the website, only the original civil or criminal case should be displayed, with a hyperlink from that case to the judgment case and to the case docket, if available. An explanation should also appear on the screen stating that even though the judgment has a separate identifying case number, it is not a separate or different case from the criminal or civil proceedings.

Expected Benefit:

There would be less confusion over the fact that a single civil or criminal case appears with a case type 9, but ther was only one original case.

Any Additional Information:

This request was generated based on the JISC adopting the recommendations of the JISC Public Case Search Workgroup on August 18th, 2010. This work detailed in this request will fulfill Recommendation Number 7 from the report.

Endorsement Detail
Endorsing Committee
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Endorser Name:
   Ammons, Kevin
Origination Date:
   08/20/2010
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments

This request was part of a series of recommendation adopted at the August 18th, 2010 meeting of the JISC. As such, this request will proceed to the analysis stage.

AOC Analysis Detail
Analysis Date: 09/09/2010
Request Rationale
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: Yes
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: Yes
Breadth of Solution Benefit: Wide
Cost Estimates
Cost Benefit Analysis Complete? No
Feasibility Study needed? No
Court Level User Group
Superior Courts
Approving Authority CIO
Request Summary:

When a search is performed on the website, only the original civil or criminal case should be displayed, with a hyperlink from that case to the judgment case and to the case docket, if available. An explanation should also appear on the screen stating that even though the judgment has a separate identifying case number, it is not a separate or different case from the criminal or civil proceedings.

Business Impacts:

There would be less confusion among the users of the public case search functionality over the fact that a single civil or criminal case appears with a case type 9, but there was only one original case.

Summary of Proposed Solution

The solution that the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) proposes to alleviate the confusion caused by judgments displaying as separate case numbers on the public case search website, is that on the public case search website, SCOMIS judgment cases will no longer appear as separate case numbers. Instead of a judgment showing as a separate case number, on the search results page of the website when a case is listed that has a judgment, a “Judgment link” will be added under the case number for the associated judgment case.

Proposed Solution

When the user clicks on the “Judgment link”, the website will display the Judgment case summary. The Judgment case summary will also include the originating case number in the case information.

Additional Systems Affected
Other
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
Endorsing Committee
   AOC (endorses for other communities)
Endorser Name:
   Ammons, Kevin
Origination Date:
   09/23/2010
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments

The analysis of this request was reviewed to ensure it complied with the Public Case Search Committee's intent. It does meet the intent and will now proceed to the Superior Court CLUG for prioritization.

Court Level User Group Decision Detail
CLUG Superior Courts
Chair of Group Judge Dalton
Date of Decision 09/09/2011
Decision
Decision to Recommend for Approval Unamimously recommended to the approving authority
Priority Processing Status Prioritized
Ranking
Scoring Detail Score / Possible
Business Value 10 / 10
Relative Priority 10 / 10
Cost 5 /  5
Complexity/Level of Effort 10 / 10
Risk 5 /  5
Benefit / Impact 5 /  5
Impact of Doing Nothing 2 /  5
Total Score 47 / 50
Additional Notes

The group wishes the JISC to know that this is the first request that was presented before them and therefore, the priority is not weighted against other requests at this time.

Implementation Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage Authorized
Comments:

This project was authorized by Vonnie Diseth in October, 2010.

Implementation Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage Scheduled
Comments:

This project was scheduled to begin in October, 2010.

Implementation Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage In Progress
Comments:

This project is currently scheduled to conclude on Mar 16, 2011.

Implementation Detail
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage In Progress
Comments:

This enhancement implemented on March 18th, 2011.

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S3