|
32 - Batch enter attorney's to multiple cases
|
|
Request Status Summary |
Request Status |
Completed |
Status Comment |
This ITG request was implemented on 12/18/2017. Reference JIS Release Note dated 11/30/2017. |
|
Request Detail |
Requestor Name: |
|
Vance, Aimee R |
Origination Date: |
|
09/21/2010 |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
|
District and Municipal Court Management Association |
|
Request Type: |
Change or Enhancement
|
Which Systems are affected? |
Judicial Information System (JIS)
|
Business Area: |
Person Maintenance
|
Communities Impacted: |
CLJ Managers
|
Impact if not Resolved: |
Medium |
Impact Description: |
Court staff would have to continue to take the time to add each participant individually
|
|
|
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
This is unresolved change request #145
Court would like a process to enter an attorney onto multiple cases.
Create a Batch CSPA screen.
|
Expected Benefit: |
Courts often receive stacks of Notice of Appearances for public defenders. It would save court staff time if they could have a screen to enter the attorney's BAR, participant type, and begin effective date, then a list of cases to attach them as a participant.
|
Endorsement Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
District and Municipal Court Management Association |
Endorser Name: |
|
Vance, Aimee R |
Origination Date: |
|
09/21/2010 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
This request was discussed at a previous Endorsement Group meeting.
|
|
|
AOC Analysis Detail
– Superseded
|
Analysis Date: |
10/15/2010
|
Request Rationale |
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Wide |
Cost Estimates |
Cost Benefit Analysis Complete? |
No |
Cost to Implement? |
318 hours |
Projected Maintenance cost? |
0 |
Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
Court Level User Group |
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction |
Approving Authority |
CIO |
|
Request Summary: |
This request is for an enhancement to enable courts to attach an attorney to multiple cases more easily. The courts wish to have a screen where they can enter the attorney's BAR Number and Begin Effective Date one time and then enter multiple case numbers on which to add that same attorney as a case participant. |
Business Impacts: |
This enhancement would allow Courts of Limited Jurisdiction staff to expedite the processing of Notice of Appearances for public defenders. Court staff would no longer have to loop through the CSPA screen for each case in order to associate the same attorney to multiple cases. |
Summary of Proposed Solution |
AOC would create a new screen to accommodate this enhancement. The user would be prompted to enter the attorney's BAR number, and the system would echo back the attorney information for confirmation. In order to add the attorney as a case participant, the user would enter a set of case numbers, similar to the batch processing available on the Batch Docketing (BDK) screen. |
Proposed Solution |
This request will be accomplished by AOC staff. |
|
|
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail – Superseded
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
District and Municipal Court Management Association |
Endorser Name: |
|
Vance, Aimee R |
Origination Date: |
|
10/26/2010 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Returned |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
As discussed at the 10/21/10 meeting we would like to see the analysis including creating a batch removal screen.
|
|
|
AOC Analysis Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
11/30/2010
|
Request Rationale |
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Wide |
Cost Estimates |
Cost to Implement? |
696 hours |
Projected Maintenance cost? |
$0 |
Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
Court Level User Group |
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction |
Approving Authority |
CIO |
|
Request Summary: |
The endorsing body has also requested that the batch removal of attorneys be analyzed as part of this effort. |
Business Impacts: |
CLJ staff will be able to add and remove attorneys through a batch process. |
Summary of Proposed Solution |
AOC would create two new screens to accommodate this enhancement. The first screen would be for a batch add process and the second for a batch remove. |
Proposed Solution |
On the batch add screen, the user would be prompted to enter the attorney's BAR number, and the system would echo back the attorney information for confirmation. In order to add the attorney as a case participant, the user would enter a set of case numbers, similar to the batch processing available on the Batch Docketing (BDK) screen. The batch remove screen would function in a similar manner. |
|
|
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
District and Municipal Court Management Association |
Endorser Name: |
|
Vance, Aimee R |
Origination Date: |
|
12/08/2010 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
***IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING ENDORSEMENT***
The DMCMA Endorsing Group has agreed to endorse this request as originally entered. We will not be endorsing the secondary analysis to include a batch removal process at this time.
|
|
|
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
|
CLUG |
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction |
Chair of Group |
Cynthia Marr |
Date of Decision |
01/11/2011 |
Decision |
Decision to Recommend for Approval |
Unamimously recommended to the approving authority |
Priority Processing Status |
Prioritized |
Ranking |
Request Importance |
Medium |
|
Scoring Detail |
Score / Possible |
Business Value |
7 / 10 |
Relative Priority |
7 / 10 |
Cost |
3 / 5 |
Complexity/Level of Effort |
8 / 10 |
Risk |
4 / 5 |
Benefit / Impact |
4 / 5 |
Impact of Doing Nothing |
0 / 5 |
Total Score |
33 / 50 |
|
|
Implementation Detail
– Superseded
|
Analysis Date: |
02/28/2011 |
Implementation Stage
|
Authorized
|
|
Comments:
|
Authorized by Vonnie Diseth on Feb 3, 2011.
|
|
|
Implementation Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
04/17/2013 |
Implementation Stage
|
Authorized
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Non-Prioritized
|
|
Comments:
|
This entry is to clarify the request that was endorsed, recommended and authorized is for the batch entry of attorneys only. Batch removal of attorneys is not included. See attached ITG Analysis Sheet.
|
|
|
|
|