|
7 - SCOMIS Field for CPG Number
|
|
Request Status Summary |
Request Status |
Closed |
JISC Priority |
0 |
Status Comment |
04/04/2018 AOC Manager of Office of Guardianship and Elder Service Stacey Johnson deems this ITG obsolete. |
|
Request Detail |
Requestor Name: |
|
Jameson, Deborah |
Origination Date: |
|
08/02/2010 |
|
|
Recommended Endorser:
|
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
|
Request Type: |
Change or Enhancement
|
Which Systems are affected? |
Judicial Information System (JIS)
|
Business Area: |
Civil Case Management
|
Communities Impacted: |
Superior Court Judges
County Clerks
Superior Court Administrators
|
Impact if not Resolved: |
Medium |
|
|
What is the Business Problem or Opportunity |
The Certified Professional Guardian (CPG) Board is charged with, among other things, protecting the public with respect to CPGs. In order to notify the superior courts about changes in a CPGs status (inactive, decertified, voluntary surrender), the CPG Board is submitting this request to create a SCOMIS field for a CPG's number.
Similarly to attorneys, each CPG has a unique number identified with him/her/agency. If this number was entered into a SCOMIS field, then the CPG Board could easily generate queries to identify all cases in which a particular CPG had been appointed and notify the court regarding the CPG's change of status. The number could also be tied to AOC's guardian maintenance database and updated email, address, and phone information would be available in the same way that it is available on attorneys.
Without this change, AOC has to rely on statewide SCOMIS searches based on the CPG's name--which is often misspelled, not entered, or wrongly identified. The risk is that a no-longer CPG could continue to practice without the court or the public's knowledge.
|
Expected Benefit: |
1. With a BOXI query, a court or AOC could quickly identify all cases in which a particular CPG or CPG Agency had been appointed. If the court had concerns about a particular CPG's practice, the court would know all cases to monitor.
2. AOC could notify all counties in which a CPG had cases of the CPG's change in status and ensure that the CPG was no longer practicing as a professional if he/she had been decertified, voluntarily surrendered, or become inactive.
3. Data from AOC's guardian maintenance site could feed into SCOMIS and provide the court community and the public with current address, phone number, and email information.
|
Any Additional Information: |
• SCOMIS Names Screen changes to build something for CPGs which is very similar to attorneys: enter the unique participant type-code/number, then enter the CPG # with a "keyword" to signal SCOMIS to look up the CPG # & echo back the name. Approximately 60 hours.
• OFO Screen changes to display the CPGs similar to attorneys: display known info, protect from changes. Approximately 30 hours.
• Identifying and making table changes as needed to support the code changes above. Also Data Dictionary & other documentation for new official type. Approximately 15 hours.
• Some kind of upload/validation between JIS and the app (built by Info Delv) which currently manages CPGs. Assume 80 hours for minimal data transfer, up to 120 if address/phone/e-mail info must be validated & uploaded.
Total hours - minimum 185 hours, to 225 hours.
|
Endorsement Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
Endorser Name: |
|
Morford, Heather on behalf of AOC Endorsing Group Members |
Origination Date: |
|
08/12/2010 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
|
|
AOC Analysis Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
11/12/2010
|
Request Rationale |
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: |
Yes |
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: |
Yes |
Breadth of Solution Benefit: |
Wide |
Cost Estimates |
Cost to Implement? |
1671 person-hours |
Projected Maintenance cost? |
Minimal |
Feasibility Study needed? |
No |
Court Level User Group |
Superior Courts |
Approving Authority |
JISC |
|
Request Summary: |
The customer requests that AOC add a field to SCOMIS for the CPG number. This will eliminate the current practice of doing state-wide searches in SCOMIS based on a CPG's name, which is often misspelled. |
Business Impacts: |
1. With a BOXI query, a court or AOC could quickly identify all cases in which a particular CPG or CPG Agency had been appointed. If the court had concerns about a particular CPG's practice, the court would know all cases to monitor.
2. AOC could notify all counties in which a CPG had cases of the CPG's change in status and ensure that the CPG was no longer practicing as a professional if he/she had been decertified, voluntarily surrendered, or become inactive.
3. Data from AOC's guardian maintenance site could feed into SCOMIS and provide the court community and the public with current address, phone number, and email information.
|
Summary of Proposed Solution |
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) proposes to create a new person type for Certified Professional Guardians (CPG). A CPG would be added as a case participant by entering the CPG number into the system in the same way that attorneys are added by Bar number. A BOXI report would also be created to simplify gathering the data requested. |
Proposed Solution |
AOC's proposed solution would create a data exchange to load CPG information from the current SQL database into the mainframe. An extract program would update or maintain the person table for a new person type, Certified Public Guardian. The new person type would function in the same manner as Bar numbers are used to identify attorneys. When adding a CPG to a case, court staff would enter the CPG Connection Code and the name would populate on the SCOMIS Names Screen. This enhancement would only affect Superior Court Case Type 4 with cause type GDN. |
|
|
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
|
Endorsing Committee |
|
AOC (endorses for other communities) |
Endorser Name: |
|
Morford, Heather T on behalf of AOC Endorsing Group |
Origination Date: |
|
12/21/2010 |
|
Endorsing Action: |
Endorsed |
Endorser’s Explanation and Comments |
The AOC endorsing group feels that the decision is best considered by the Superior Court commissioners, clerks and judges as a deciding body and therefore has moved the request to teh CLUG level.
|
|
|
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
|
CLUG |
Superior Courts |
Chair of Group |
Judge Dalton |
Date of Decision |
01/12/2011 |
Decision |
Decision to Recommend for Approval |
Unamimously recommended to the approving authority |
Priority Processing Status |
Prioritized |
Ranking |
Request Importance |
High |
|
Scoring Detail |
Score / Possible |
Business Value |
10 / 10 |
Relative Priority |
10 / 10 |
Cost |
5 / 5 |
Complexity/Level of Effort |
8 / 10 |
Risk |
5 / 5 |
Benefit / Impact |
5 / 5 |
Impact of Doing Nothing |
5 / 5 |
Total Score |
48 / 50 |
|
Additional Notes |
*The group wishes the JISC to know that this request has priority over all others at this time since other requests have been approved under delegation matrix. |
|
Implementation Detail
|
Analysis Date: |
|
Implementation Stage
|
Authorized
|
Prioritization Option:
|
Prioritized
|
|
Comments:
|
This request was authorized by the JISC on Feb 18, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|