77 - Allow FTAs to Issue When AR is Zero

 
Request Status Summary
Request Status Completed
Status Comment Change was implemented on December 2, 2013.
Request Detail
Requestor Name:
   Marin, Vicky on behalf of Aimee Vance
Origination Date:
   03/08/2011
    
Recommended Endorser:
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Request Type: Change or Enhancement
Which Systems are affected? Judicial Information System (JIS)
Business Area: FTA
Communities Impacted: CLJ Managers
Impact if not Resolved: Medium
Impact Description:

Clerks have to order the warrant and FTA on one day and then wait until the FTA shows issued before forfeiting the bail. It is time consuming and they often forget to do it.

What is the Business Problem or Opportunity

Change the system to allow FTA's to issue even if the AR is zero. FTA's are not always issued because of a delinquent balance, such as in a case where it is due to an actual failure to appear.

Expected Benefit:

This scenario happens regularly: A person fails to appear for a criminal hearing, bail is forfeited, and a warrant and FTA are issued. However, because the AR was cleared when the bail was forfeited the FTA won't go to DOL and it appears on the exception report. The only remedy is to create a "fake" AR of $1 to allow the FTA to go.

Endorsement Detail
Endorsing Committee
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Endorser Name:
   Vance, Aimee R
Origination Date:
   03/31/2011
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
AOC Analysis Detail
Analysis Date: 09/15/2011
Request Rationale
Aligns with JIS Business Priorities, IT Strategies & Plans: Yes
Aligns with applicable policies and with ISD Standards: Yes
Breadth of Solution Benefit: Wide
Cost Estimates
Cost to Implement? 100 hours
Feasibility Study needed? No
Court Level User Group
Courts of Limited Jurisdiction
Request Summary:

This request seeks to change the Judicial Information System (JIS) to allow a Failure to Appear (FTA) to issue even when the Account Receivable (AR) is zero. This would allow courts to issue FTAs without performing a workaround of creating a "fake" AR of $1 when the balance is zero.

Business Impacts:

Currently clerks have to order a warrant and FTA on one day and then wait until the FTA shows as issued before they go back into the system and forfeit the bail. This action is time consuming and staff occasionally forgets to complete the actions.

Summary of Proposed Solution

The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) would enhance the Judicial Information System (JIS) to allow FTAs to issue when there is a zero balance on the AR for the case. AOC has determined that the requirement for the current functionality originally derived from the Department of Licensing's (DOL) FTA process. As part of the analysis, AOC has discussed this request with DOL and verified that the DOL FTA process no longer requires an amount due of greater than zero for an FTA to process correctly.

Proposed Solution

AOC would enhance JIS to allow FTAs to issue when there is a zero balance for the case. The courts will be able to: (a) Order an FTA, (b) Issue an FTA automatically, or (3) Issue an FTA manually for a case with no accounts receivable.

Additional Systems Affected
Judicial Information System (JIS)
Communities Impacted
CLJ Managers
Confirmation of Endorsing Action Detail
Endorsing Committee
   District and Municipal Court Management Association
Endorser Name:
   Vance, Aimee R
Origination Date:
   09/19/2012
Endorsing Action: Endorsed
Court Level User Group Decision Detail
CLUG Courts of Limited Jurisdiction
Chair of Group Cynthia Marr
Date of Decision 01/25/2013
Decision
Decision to Recommend for Approval Unamimously recommended to the approving authority
Priority Processing Status Prioritized
Ranking
Request Importance Medium
Scoring Detail Score / Possible
Business Value 7 / 10
Relative Priority 7 / 10
Cost 5 /  5
Complexity/Level of Effort 10 / 10
Risk 5 /  5
Benefit / Impact 4 /  5
Impact of Doing Nothing 0 /  5
Total Score 38 / 50
Implementation Detail  – Superseded
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage Authorized
Prioritization Option: Non-Prioritized
Implementation Detail
Analysis Date:
Implementation Stage In Progress
Prioritization Option: Non-Prioritized
Comments:
Work is in progress on this request.
 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S3