State of WashingtonEthics Advisory CommitteeOpinion 84-04Question Is it proper under the Code of Judicial Conduct for a District Court Judge to permit or direct court staff to:
Answer It is proper under the Code of Judicial Conduct for a District Court Judge to permit or direct court staff to prepare a list of names and other identifying data of persons who have failed to appear in court after signing a promise to respond to a traffic infraction and to refer the list to the appropriate prosecuting attorney or city attorney. However, it is not proper under CJC Canon 2A for a District Court Judge to permit or direct court staff to prepare complaints alleging a violation of RCW 46.64.020 and forwarding the unsigned complaints to the appropriate prosecuting or city attorney for review to determine whether these complaints shall be signed and filed with the court. Assuming the judge has no personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts, it is not improper for a District Court Judge to adjudicated cases which are before the court as a result of a list of prepared by court staff identifying persons who have failed to appear. However, if the judge does possess personal knowledge of the disputed facts, the judge should disclose this to any lawyers or parties involved in the action in which the judge’s impartiality or appearance thereof may reasonably be questioned under CJC Canon 3, and the Judge should offer to withdraw from the case. Since it is not proper for a District Court Judge to permit or direct court Staff to prepare unsigned complaints and to forward them to the appropriate prosecuting or city attorney for review, that portion of the third issue relative to this practice need not be addressed.
Opinion 84-04 07/20/1984 |
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S5