State of WashingtonEthics Advisory CommitteeOpinion 92-15Withdrawn Opinion 92-15 Withdrawn 6/19/2014 Question Answer Because the public defenders would appear in this court before the pro tem judge, it would not be appropriate under Canon 5B(1) for the judge to appoint the attorney who serves on the public defender board as the pro tem judge. See Opinion 92-3 NOTE: Effective June 23, 1995, the Supreme Court amended the Code of Judicial Conduct. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:
Opinion 92-15 09/21/1992 |
Privacy and Disclaimer Notices Sitemap
© Copyright 2025. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.
S3