November 16, 2000

9:00 A.M.

Olympia

Thursday, November 16, 2000

Case No. 1 - 68994-6	COUNSEL
In the Matter of the License to Practice Medicine and Surgery of Bang D. Nguyen,          v. State of Washington, Department of Health, Medical Quality Assurance Commission	Ralph Alfieri David Hankins
SYNOPSIS: Whether Due Process or Equal Protection requires the State to prove its allegations in professional disciplinary hearings by more than a mere preponderance of the evidence.

Case No. 2 - 68535-5	COUNSEL
Ignacio Guillen, as legal guardian for Jennifer Guillen and Alma Guillen, minors; and Mariano Guillen, as legal guardian for Paulina Guillen and Fatima Guillen          v. Pierce County, a municipal corporation ------------------------------------------------ 69327-7 Robert and LuAnn Whitmer, husband and wife, individually, and as the guardians of Shana Whitmer, a minor, Hannah Whitmer, a minor, and Denel Whitmer, an incapacitated person,          v. Chin S. Yuk and Jane Doe Yuk, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; Chang Choi and Jane Doe Choi, husband and wife, City of Tacoma; Pierce County; and the City of Lakewood	Salvador Mungia Juliana Burnett Darrell Cochran David DeWolf Susan Jensen Daniel Hamilton Richard Benedetti Keith Kessler Garth Jones Timothy Malarchick Jeffrey Hale Harold Dodge Vernon Harkins Thomas West Philip Brennan
SYNOPSIS: Whether accident reports and other raw data compiled pursuant to state and local law are subject to public disclosure, or to discovery under 23 U.S.C. § 409 as amended in 1995 if they are also collected to identify roads eligible for federal hazard elimination funds; and if so, whether § 409 unconstitutionally violates state sovereignty.

---

1:30 P.M.

---

Case No. 3 - 69283-1	COUNSEL
David E. Svendsen,          v. Connie Edwards and John L. Scott, Inc.,          Respondents, Greenwood Point Homeowners Association, Seattle/Eastside Building Inspections, Inc.; and David M. Irvine,	George Purdy Charles Wiggins Douglas Tingvall
SYNOPSIS: Whether RCW 64.06.060 precludes a Consumer Protection Act claim against a real estate agent who allegedly committed fraudulent concealment in connection with the preparation of a seller's disclosure statement.

These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.