9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Wednesday, January 22, 2003
|
|
|
Case No. 1 – 72412-1
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Viengmone Khounvichai
|
Randi Austell
Eric Nielsen
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether evidence of the defendant’s drug possession, found in his home, should have been suppressed because police officers who went to his home to talk with him about an unrelated crime failed to inform his grandmother, who answered the door, that she did not have to let them in and could revoke her consent at any time.
|
|
|
Case No. 2 – 72366-4
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Marriage of
John Christopher Rideout,
and
Sara Dixon Rideout
|
Charles Szurszewski
Kenneth Master/Charles Wiggins
Melissa Denton
|
SYNOPSIS: What is the proper appellate standard of review where a trial court’s decision is based solely on documentation, including declarations, and where the credibility of the parties is at issue before the court. Additionally, whether a divorced parent may be held in contempt for bad faith violation of a parenting plan when a child refuses visitation with the noncustodial parent.
|
1:30 P.M.
|
|
Case No. 3 – 72435-1
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Peter H. Moen
|
Andrew Metts/Kevin Korsmo
Paul Mack
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether a prosecutor may condition plea bargaining on a defendant’s waiver of the right to request the identity of a confidential informant in a related civil action seeking return of forfeited property.
|
|
|
Case No. 4 – 72436-9
|
COUNSEL
|
Judy Kloepfel,
v.
Joseph Bokor
|
Charles Conrad
Stanley Perdue
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether a plaintiff must present medical evidence of objective physical symptoms or manifestations of severe emotional injury in order to prevail on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|
