9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Thursday, March 27, 2003
|
Case No. 1 – 72629-9
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Patrick Deryke
|
Erik Pedersen
Cheryl Aza
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the “to convict” instruction on a charge of attempted first degree rape was inadequate because it failed to specify the degree of rape allegedly attempted.
|
Case No. 2 – 72710-4
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Jeanne Pearl Baldwin
|
Charles Blackman/Seth Fine
Shannon Marsh
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the defendant’s convictions for identity theft and forgery violate state and federal double jeopardy protections. Additionally, whether the statutes that authorized the defendant’s exceptional sentences, RCW 9.94A.120 and RCW 9.94A.390, are unconstitutionally vague and thus violate her due process rights.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 72896-8
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Steven J. Snedden
|
Kevin Korsmo
John Whaley
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether indecent exposure is “a crime against a person” that can support a charge of second degree burglary under RCW 9A.52.030(1).
|
Case No. 4 – Bar No. 9756
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Matter of Grosvenor Anschell,
Attorney at Law
|
Grosvenor Anschell-pro se
Jean McElroy-WSBA
Fredric Tausend/Jason Holtman
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether appellant should be disbarred from the practice of law.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|
