9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Tuesday, October 21, 2003
|
Case No. 1 - 73301-5
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington.
v.
M.K. (DOB 3/28/87)
|
Dennis McCurdy
Gregory Link
|
SYNOPSIS: A middle-school student challenges his conviction of felony harassment, claiming that his statement implying a school-shooting was intended as a joke.
|
Case No. 2 – 73310-4
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington.
v.
C.G. (DOB 8/13/85)
|
James Hulbert/Laura Hayes
Dana Nelson
|
SYNOPSIS: A high-school student challenges her conviction of felony harassment, on the ground that the victim did not fear that her threat to kill would be carried out.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 73930-7
|
COUNSEL
|
Rick Hangartner,
v.
City of Seattle
|
Aaron Caplan/Duncan Manville
Edwin Inkley
Roger Wynne/Shelley Pellegrino
Mary Johnson
|
SYNOPSIS: The Public Disclosure Act mandates broad access to public records. The attorney-client privilege protects certain types of documents from disclosure. The court examines the interplay between the Public Disclosure Act and the attorney-client privilege.
|
Case No. 4 – 73930-7
|
COUNSEL
|
Citizens Against the Monorail,
v.
The Elevated Transportation Company, and Harold Robertson
|
Judith Endejan
Paul Lawrence
Martha Dawson/Holly Harris
Stephen Smith/Matthew Segal
|
SYNOPSIS: This case is consolidated with the previous case, Hangartner v. City of Seattle, and the primary issues are the same.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|