Supreme Court Calendar

9:00 A.M.

Olympia

Thursday, October 30, 2003

Case No. 1 – 73357-1

COUNSEL

Jerry L. Hisle, Michael D, Nicholas, Dale A. Riccetti, Jerry Roth, Ron L. Shoup,
     v.
Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation

Bruce Heller
Seth Berntsen

Philip Talmadge
Richard Omata/Jennifer Burkhardt

SYNOPSIS: Todd Pacific Shipyards and its employees signed an agreement stating that Todd’s employees would be paid 60¢ for every hour they worked from one date to another. Hisle is hundreds of Todd employees who feel they should be paid overtime (90¢ an hour) for the overtime hours they worked between the dates listed in the agreement. In addition to whether overtime should be paid, this case also addresses whether federal or state courts should hear this case, whether this case was already decided in a prior suit, and whether costs and attorney fees should be granted on appeal.

Case No. 2 – 73531-0

COUNSEL

Yaeko Otani, Deceased, through her personal representative, Pauline Shigaki,

     v.
David R. Broudy, M.D.

Paul Stritmatter/Garth Jones
Ray Kahler/Ree Schifferman
Dwayne Richards

Mary Spillane/Daniel Ferm

SYNOPSIS: This case requires the court to determine whether RCW 4.20.046, Washington’s general survival statute, allows a decedent’s estate to recover damages for a decedent’s loss of enjoyment of life, including shortened life expectancy.


1:30 P.M.

Case No. 3 – 73197-7

COUNSEL

Arborwood Idaho,
     v.
City of Kennewick

Teri Tomich-Salinas/Daryl Jonson

John Ziobro

SYNOPSIS: The City of Kennewick collects a monthly ambulance charge from every household in the city.  Arborwood, a non-resident owner of apartments in Kennewick, objects to the ambulance charge.

Case No. 4 – 67680-1

COUNSEL

Guardianship Estate of Danny Keffeler, by Wanda Pierce, Guardian,
     v.
Department of Social Health Services

Rodney Reinbold
Richard Price

Debra Casparian/Lawrence Lockwood
William Collins

SYNOPSIS:  This case requires the court to answer three questions:1) Is the federal equal protection clause violated when the State acts as a representative payee for foster children receiving social security benefits?; 2) If the State is required to provide notice prior to becoming a representative payee, is the Social Security Administration’s prior written notice adequate to satisfy procedural due process?; 3) Should attorney’s fees or costs be awarded to either party? 

These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S5