|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Tuesday, February 24, 2004
|
Case No. 1 – 73766-5
|
COUNSEL
|
Douglas M. Branson, et al,
v.
Port of Seattle
|
Spencer Hall
W. Scott Zanzig
Arthur Claflin
Phillip Ginsberg
Carl Marquardt
Paul Bintinger
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether the concession fee that is charged to car rental companies operating at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport complies with the Municipal Airports Act, chapter 14.08 RCW.
|
Case No. 2 – 73794-1 & 74092-5
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Personal Restraint Petitions of
Christopher M. Lachapelle and
Christopher Ross Westfall
|
Suzanne Elliott
Kathleen Proctor
Jeremy Randolph
|
SYNOPSIS: In these two consolidated personal restraint petitions, LaChapelle and Westfall claim their sentences do not comply with our holding in State v. Smith, 144 Wn.2d 665, 30 P.3d 1245 (2001). They seek resentencing without consideration of their juvenile offenses that “washed out” under the 1997 version of the Sentencing Reform Act.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 73906-4
|
COUNSEL
|
Evelyne Grundy,
v.
The Brack Family Trust, et al
|
Barnett Kalikow
Matthew Edwards
Jeffrey Fancher
|
SYNOPSIS: May a person challenge the validity of a permit that allows their neighbor to construct a seawall, several months after construction of the seawall is complete, when the person was not informed of the issuance of the permit?
|
Case No. 4 – 74073-9
|
COUNSEL
|
Habitat Watch,
v.
Skagit County, Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, and Port Gardner Timber Company
|
Jeffrey Eustis
Paul Reilly
Le Anne Bremer
John Hicks
|
SYNOPSIS: May a citizen’s group challenge the validity of a special permit for construction of a golf course, several years after the permit was issued, when the county issued the permit without providing notice to the public or holding a public hearing?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|
