|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Tuesday, March 23, 2004
|
Case No. 1 – 73784-3/73895-5/74171-9
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
David Wayne Ross
Russell Hunter
Donald Janell Legrone
|
Steven Sherman
Andrea Vitalich
Gregory Fullington
Thomas Doyle
Patricia Pethick
Gregory Link
Jason Saunders
|
SYNOPSIS: This case requires the Supreme Court to determine whether, by agreeing at sentencing that their prior out-of-state convictions and/or federal convictions were properly included in their offender scores, these defendants waived their challenge on appeal of the sentencing courts’ decisions to include their prior out-of-state and/or federal convictions in their offender scores. The Supreme Court must also determine whether the 2002 amendments to RCW 9.94A.525(12) apply retroactively to reduce Legrone’s offender score.
|
Case No. 2 – 73853-0
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of
Stephen J. Lord
|
David Zuckerman
Kathleen Proctor/Alicia Burton
|
SYNOPSIS: This case requires the Supreme Court to determine whether, by stipulating in his plea agreement that a prior conviction had not “washed out” and was properly included in his offender score, Lord waived his challenge that the sentencing court miscalculated his offender score when it included a “washed out” conviction. This case also requires the Supreme Court to determine whether the prosecutor breached the plea agreement when she revoked her recommendation that Lord receive Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative treatment instead of prison.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 200,009-6
|
COUNSEL
|
In re: Guillermo Romero, Bar No. 18316
Attorney at Law
|
Kurt Bulmer
Christine Gray-WSBA
|
SYNOPSIS:Whether the Washington State Bar Association has established sufficient acts of misconduct to justify disbarment of attorney Guillermo Romero?
|
Case No. 4 – 74579-0/74602-8/74603-6
|
COUNSEL
|
City of Seattle; State of Washington,
v.
Wonda Clark-Munoz,
Gareth Hall,
Ted Jagla
|
Moses Garcia
Robert Murashige
Mychal Schwartz
Christine Jackson/Erick Spencer
Joshua Schaer
Scott Robbins
Howard Stein
|
SYNOPSIS:Did the state properly certify breathalyzers?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|
