9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Thursday, March 25, 2004
|
Case No. 1 – 73902-1
|
COUNSEL
|
Mark Riehl,
v.
Foodmaker, Inc.
|
Judith Lonnquist/Richard Reed
Katherine Franklin/Leigh Ann Tift
|
SYNOPSIS: At issue are 1) whether an employee with a disability has to show that he/she medically needs an accommodation in the workplace in order to get the accommodation and 2) whether Foodmaker fired/did not rehire Riehl because he is disabled?
|
Case No. 2 – 73970-6
|
COUNSEL
|
Bank of America NT & SA f/k/a Seafirst Bank, a National banking institution,
v.
David W. Hubert, P.C., a Washington corporation; David W. Hubert and Katharine Hubert, individually and the marital community
|
Erika Balazs
Jed Morris
Patrick Rothwell
|
SYNOPSIS: At issue are (1) which bank is “the payor bank,” the bank held liable for failing to dishonor a check in a timely fashion; (2) whether Bank of America can avoid liability to Hubert P.C. by asserting that the check was fraudulently written; and (3) whether Hubert P.C. is liable to Bank of America for failing to properly supervise a paralegal.
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 74152-2
|
COUNSEL
|
Robert Edelman,
v.
State of Washington ex rel. Public Disclosure Commission
|
John White, Jr.
Kevin Hansen
Nancy Krier
|
SYNOPSIS: The court decides whether the Public Disclosure Commission exceeded its authority to interpret a Washington statute enacted to limit campaign contributions of large corporations and other entities.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|