|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Tuesday, November 9, 2004
|
Case No. 1 – 74147-6 (cons. w/75053-0, 75063-7)
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Daniel D. Hughes,
George Selvidge,
Michael Anderson
|
Craig Juris
Steven Sherman
J. Andrew Toynbee
John Farra
Thomas Doyle
Patricia Pethick
Peter Tiller
|
SYNOPSIS: Did imposition by judges of sentences greater than those supported by the juries’ verdicts violate the defendants’ jury trial rights as defined by Blakely v. Washington? Can such violations ever be harmless? What is the proper remedy?
|
Case No. 2 – 74964-7
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Arturo R. Recuenco
|
David Seaver
James Whisman
Gregory Link
|
SYNOPSIS: Does a judge’s imposition of a greater sentence based on the use of a firearm violate the defendant’s jury trial right as defined by Blakely v. Washington where the jury only found use of a deadly weapon? If so, was that violation harmless?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 75340-7
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of
Leonard B. Lavery
|
Suzanne Elliott
James Whisman
Catherine McDowall
|
SYNOPSIS: Was Lavery’s 1991 federal bank robbery conviction a strike offense under Washington’s “three strikes” law?
|
Case No. 4 – 200,104-1
|
COUNSEL
|
In re: Susan Gail Diamondstone, Bar No. 15747
Attorney at Law
|
Patrick Fannin
Joanne Abelson-WSBA
|
SYNOPSIS: Should this court adopt the recommendation of both the Bar Association hearing officer and Disciplinary Board that Diamondstone should be transferred to disability inactive status?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|
