|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Thursday, March 10, 2005
|
Case No. 1 – 200,116-5
|
COUNSEL
|
In re: Clayton E. Longacre, Bar No. 21821
Attorney at Law
|
Clayton Longacre
Sachia Powell-WSBA
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the WSBA prove that attorney Clayton Longacre committed three counts of professional misconduct, and, if so what is the appropriate sanction?
|
Case No. 2 – 75461-6
|
COUNSEL
|
Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1,
v.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for Snohomish County and City of Everett
|
Brian Snure/Clark Snure
Jason Cummings
Richard McCann/Michael Himes
Katrina Kelly
|
SYNOPSIS: RCW 36.93.090 requires that, when an annexation has been “proposed,” the initiators of the annexation must file “a notice of intention” with the county’s boundary review board within 180 days. With the completion of which step in the annexation process has the annexation been “proposed” for purposes of triggering the 180-day period?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 75920-1 (w/75951-1, 75976-6)
|
COUNSEL
|
Personal Restraint Petition of
Jerry P. Domingo,
Kiet Hoang Le, and
Bob R. Kaseweter
|
Suzanne Elliott
David Koch
Jacqueline McMurtrie
Thomas Duffy
Philip Meyers
Robert Shannon
|
SYNOPSIS: Do State v. Roberts, 142 Wn.2d 471 (2000), and State v. Cronin, 142 Wn.2d 568 (2000), constitute a “significant change in the law” of accomplice liability for the purposes of RCW 10.73.100(6)?
|
Case No. 4 – 75521-3
|
COUNSEL
|
In re the Detention of Raymond Marshall,
v.
State of Washington
|
David Schultz
Krista Bush
|
SYNOPSIS: Were certain errors committed by the trial court that warrant overturning its finding that Raymond Marshall is a sexually violent predator?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|
