|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
|
Case No. 1 – 75545-1
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Leslie A. Kull
|
Daniel Clark
Sharon Blackford
|
SYNOPSIS: Whether evidence of drugs must be suppressed on the ground that a police officer’s entry into the defendant’s home violated the state constitution.
|
Case No. 2 – 75606-6
|
COUNSEL
|
Donald R. Gorman and Flaellen Gorman,
v.
Lockheed Shipbuilding Company and Todd Shipyards Corporation
----------------------------------
Wilhemina Helton,
v.
Todd Shipyards Corporation
|
William Rutzick
William Beaver, Jr.
Walter Barton
Robert Madden
|
SYNOPSIS: Are petitioners’ claims barred by state or federal workers’ compensation law?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 – 75728-3
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Zachary E. Tinker
|
Amy Holt
Dana Lind
|
SYNOPSIS: Tinker claims that the document charging him with third degree theft violated constitutional due process protections by improperly omitting the value of the property stolen.
|
Case No. 4 – 75866-2
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington,
v.
Stephen E. Leyda
|
Brian McDonald
Eric Nielsen
|
SYNOPSIS: Leyda claims the trial court violated constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy in determining the unit of prosecution for identity theft, and Leyda claims that the document charging him with his crimes improperly omitted the value of the property stolen in alleging second degree identity theft and third degree theft.
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only.
|
