|
|
9:00 A.M. |
Olympia |
Tuesday, February 14, 2006 |
|
Case No. 1 -76527-8 |
COUNSEL |
|
Supervalu Holdings, Inc.
v.
Washington State Department of Labor and Industries |
Aaron Owada
William Collins/ Michael Hall |
|
SYNOPSIS: Did Initiative Measure 841 eliminate the Department of Labor & Industries’ ability to enforce ergonomic-related workplace hazards under the “general duty clause?” |
|
Case No. 2 -76720-3 |
COUNSEL |
|
Kurtis and Pamela Mayer
v.
Sto Industries, Inc. |
Margaret Archer/Bradley Maxa
James Meade
Philip Talmadge/Anne Melley
Kenneth Hobbs |
|
SYNOPSIS: Did the trial court abuse its discretion in awarding monetary compensatory sanctions for discovery abuse without considering on the record a lesser sanction, the willfulness of the abuse, and the prejudice arising from it? |
1:30 P.M.
|
Case No. 3 -76824-2
CONSOLIDATED |
COUNSEL |
|
Steven A. Lewis
v.
State of Washington, Department of Licensing
----------------------------------------
State of Washington
v.
Kenneth D. Higgins
----------------------------------------
77110-3
City of Auburn
v.
Edward Kelly
----------------------------------------
City of Auburn
v.
Andrew DeWaele |
Ryan Robertson/Francisco Duarte
Masako Kanazawa/Jay Geck/Susan Sacket DanPullo
Susan Storey
Ryan Robertson/Francisco Duarte
Daniel Heid
Matthew Rusnak
Daniel Heid
Andrea Robertson |
|
SYNOPSIS: Must police officers warn traffic stop detainees that the officer is recording their conversation? |
|
Case No. 4 -77317-3 |
COUNSEL |
|
Personal Restraint Petition of
Gilberto E. Cruz,
Petitioner.
|
Thomas Weaver
Kevin Korsmo |
|
SYNOPSIS: Does RCW 69.50.408’s language “twice the term otherwise authorized” refer to the standard range sentence or the maximum sentence or both? |
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only. |
