|
9:00 A.M.
|
Olympia
|
Thursday, March 2, 2006
|
THREE CASES ONLY – TWO A.M. – ONE P.M.
Case No. 1 - 76850-1
|
COUNSEL
|
Lakemont Ridge Homeowners Association
v.
Lakemont Ridge Limited Partnership
|
Robert Goff/Daniel DeWalt/Kenneth Masters
Mark O'Donnell/David Poore/
Lori Kay McKown
|
SYNOPSIS: Does the “notice and opportunity to cure” provision of the Construction Defect Claims Act apply to a homeowner's lawsuit when the construction professionals did not give initial notice of the requirement because they constructed the condominiums before the statute became effective?
|
Case No. 2 - 76938-9
|
COUNSEL
|
Ballard Square Condominium Owners Association
v.
Dynasty Construction Company
v.
Wall Finishes, Inc.
|
Todd C. Hayes/Thomas F. Ahearne
Eileen I. McKillop/Heather D.S. Perkins
|
SYNOPSIS: May a claimant bring a lawsuit against a dissolved corporation?
|
1:30 P.M.
Case No. 3 - 77122-7
REVIEW LIMITED TO GOOD FAITH ISSUE
|
COUNSEL
|
State of Washington
v.
Montie Eugene Welker a/k/a Montie Welver
|
Michael C. Kinnie
David Schultz
|
SYNOPSIS: Did a prosecutor fail to act with good faith and due diligence when he did not take steps to bring to trial in Washington a defendant charged in Washington but incarcerated out-of-state on unrelated charges?
|
These summaries are not formulated by the Court and are provided for the convenience of the public only. |
